Biteker Murat, Duman Dursun, Dayan Akın, Can Mehmet Mustafa, Tekkeşin Ahmet Ilker
Department of Cardiology, Haydarpaşa Numune Education and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2011 Jul;39(5):365-70. doi: 10.5543/tkda.2011.01530.
We investigated the prevalence and indications of digoxin use in elderly patients presenting to a cardiology outpatient clinic of a tertiary hospital in Turkey.
On a prospective basis, the study included 800 consecutive patients aged 70 or over (mean age 77 ± 6 years) who presented to our cardiology outpatient clinic. There were 124 patients (15.5%) receiving digoxin. All the patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography. Digoxin use was considered inappropriate if the patient had normal left ventricle systolic function or if there was no atrial fibrillation (AF).
The reasons for use of long-term digoxin were persistent AF (n=55, 44.4%), heart failure (HF) (n=51, 41.1%), and paroxysmal AF (n=8, 6.5%). The exact reason could not be determined in 10 patients (8.1%). Digoxin use was based on appropriate indications in 76 patients (61.3%), whereas 48 patients (38.7%) were taking digoxin with inappropriate indications. Of 51 patients for whom HF was the only reason for digoxin therapy, diagnosis of HF was incorrect in 30 patients (24.2%). Other inappropriate indications were paroxysmal AF and undetermined indication for digoxin prescription. Concerning digoxin dose, 24 patients (19.4%) received one tablet (0.25 mg) and 30 patients (24.2%) received a half tablet (0.125 mg) on a daily basis, while 10 patients (8.1%) used six tablets per week with one day off (0.214 mg/day) and 60 patients (48.4%) took five tablets per week with two days off (0.179 mg/day). The median daily dose was 0.182 mg/day. Digoxin dose was higher than the recommended doses for elderly patients in 75.8% of the patients.
Our findings show that nearly 40% of elderly patients receive digoxin with inappropriate indications and 75% of these patients take digoxin at higher doses than the recommended doses for this age group.
我们调查了在土耳其一家三级医院心脏病门诊就诊的老年患者中地高辛的使用情况及适应证。
本研究前瞻性纳入了800例连续就诊于我院心脏病门诊的70岁及以上患者(平均年龄77±6岁)。其中124例患者(15.5%)正在服用地高辛。所有患者均接受了经胸超声心动图检查。如果患者左心室收缩功能正常或不存在心房颤动(AF),则认为地高辛使用不当。
长期使用地高辛的原因包括持续性AF(n=55,44.4%)、心力衰竭(HF)(n=51,41.1%)和阵发性AF(n=8,6.5%)。10例患者(8.1%)无法确定确切原因。76例患者(61.3%)使用地高辛有适当的适应证,而48例患者(38.7%)服用地高辛的适应证不适当。在51例仅因HF而接受地高辛治疗的患者中,30例患者(24.2%)的HF诊断不正确。其他不适当的适应证为阵发性AF和地高辛处方适应证不明确。关于地高辛剂量,24例患者(19.4%)每天服用1片(0.25mg),30例患者(24.2%)每天服用半片(0.125mg),10例患者(8.1%)每周服用6片,休息1天(0.214mg/天),60例患者(48.4%)每周服用5片,休息2天(0.179mg/天)。日均剂量中位数为0.182mg/天。75.8%的患者地高辛剂量高于老年患者推荐剂量。
我们的研究结果表明,近40%的老年患者使用地高辛的适应证不适当,且这些患者中有75%服用地高辛的剂量高于该年龄组的推荐剂量。