• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冲突与爱情:从两个互动情境预测新婚夫妇的婚姻结果。

Conflict and love: predicting newlywed marital outcomes from two interaction contexts.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716-2577, USA.

出版信息

J Fam Psychol. 2011 Aug;25(4):541-50. doi: 10.1037/a0024507.

DOI:10.1037/a0024507
PMID:21744960
Abstract

Research on marital interaction has focused primarily on couples in conflict contexts to understand better processes associated with concurrent and longitudinal outcomes such as marital stability and quality. Although this work has consistently revealed particular emotions (e.g., contempt) or behavioral sequences (e.g., demand/withdraw) predictive of later marital distress, it largely has neglected to take positive contexts into consideration. The present longitudinal study begins to address this gap in the literature by directly comparing newlywed behaviors from a conflict-resolution interaction with those from a love-paradigm interaction to predict relationship satisfaction and divorce proneness approximately 15 months later. Results showed that actor and partner negative (contempt) and positive (affection) emotions elicited in both positive (i.e., love) and negative (i.e., conflict) interaction contexts emerged as unique predictors of relationship quality and stability for both husbands and wives. Moreover, using a linear growth model, the temporal course of positive emotion during the love context, but not the conflict context, was predictive of later relationship satisfaction. Implications for future marital research and intervention are discussed.

摘要

婚姻互动的研究主要集中在冲突情境下的夫妻身上,以更好地理解与婚姻稳定性和质量等并发和纵向结果相关的过程。尽管这项工作一直揭示了特定的情绪(例如,轻蔑)或行为序列(例如,要求/回避)可以预测以后的婚姻困扰,但它在很大程度上忽略了积极的情况。本纵向研究通过直接比较解决冲突互动和爱情范式互动中的新婚行为,来预测大约 15 个月后的关系满意度和离婚倾向,从而开始解决文献中的这一空白。结果表明,在积极(即爱情)和消极(即冲突)互动情境中引发的夫妻双方的演员和伴侣的消极(轻蔑)和积极(喜爱)情绪,是夫妻双方关系质量和稳定性的独特预测因素。此外,使用线性增长模型,在爱情情境中积极情绪的时间进程,但不是冲突情境,可预测以后的关系满意度。讨论了对未来婚姻研究和干预的影响。

相似文献

1
Conflict and love: predicting newlywed marital outcomes from two interaction contexts.冲突与爱情:从两个互动情境预测新婚夫妇的婚姻结果。
J Fam Psychol. 2011 Aug;25(4):541-50. doi: 10.1037/a0024507.
2
The connubial crucible: newlywed years as predictors of marital delight, distress, and divorce.婚姻的熔炉:新婚岁月作为婚姻幸福、苦恼和离婚的预测因素
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Feb;80(2):237-52. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.237.
3
Predicting divorce among newlyweds from the first three minutes of a marital conflict discussion.通过婚姻冲突讨论的前三分钟预测新婚夫妇的离婚情况。
Fam Process. 1999 Fall;38(3):293-301. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1999.00293.x.
4
The development of marital tension: Implications for divorce among married couples.婚姻紧张的发展:对已婚夫妇离婚的影响。
Dev Psychol. 2017 Oct;53(10):1995-2006. doi: 10.1037/dev0000379. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
5
Marriage work in older couples: Disclosure of marital problems to spouses and friends over time.老年夫妇的婚姻问题:随着时间推移向配偶和朋友透露婚姻问题。
J Fam Psychol. 2015 Oct;29(5):732-43. doi: 10.1037/fam0000099. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
6
Emotion regulation predicts marital satisfaction: more than a wives' tale.情绪调节预测婚姻满意度:不止是妻子的传说。
Emotion. 2014 Feb;14(1):130-44. doi: 10.1037/a0034272. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
7
Relations of husbands and wives dysphoria to marital conflict resolution strategies.夫妻烦躁情绪与婚姻冲突解决策略的关系。
J Fam Psychol. 2004 Mar;18(1):171-83. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.18.1.171.
8
Childhood family adversity and adult cortisol response: The role of observed marital conflict behavior.童年期家庭逆境与成人皮质醇反应:观察到的婚姻冲突行为的作用。
J Fam Psychol. 2018 Sep;32(6):793-803. doi: 10.1037/fam0000455.
9
A longitudinal investigation of stress spillover in marriage: does spousal support adequacy buffer the effects?婚姻中压力溢出的纵向研究:配偶支持是否充足会起到缓冲作用吗?
J Fam Psychol. 2008 Feb;22(1):11-20. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.22.1.11.
10
Relations between spouses' depressive symptoms and marital conflict: a longitudinal investigation of the role of conflict resolution styles.夫妻双方抑郁症状与婚姻冲突的关系:对冲突解决方式作用的纵向研究。
J Fam Psychol. 2011 Aug;25(4):531-40. doi: 10.1037/a0024216.

引用本文的文献

1
Experiential Avoidance, Dyadic Interaction and Relationship Quality in the Lives of Veterans and Their Partners.退伍军人及其伴侣生活中的经验性回避、二元互动与关系质量
J Fam Issues. 2018 Apr;39(5):1191-1212. doi: 10.1177/0192513x17698182. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
2
Emotion dynamic patterns between intimate relationship partners predict their separation two years later: A machine learning approach.亲密关系伴侣之间的情绪动态模式可预测他们两年后的分离:一种机器学习方法。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 6;18(7):e0288048. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288048. eCollection 2023.
3
The Role of Attachment and Dyadic Coping in Shaping Relational Intimacy: Actor-Partner Interdependence Model.
依恋和对偶应对在塑造关系亲密性中的作用:演员-伙伴相互依赖模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 4;19(23):16211. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316211.
4
Changes in Couples' Relationships and Their Differences in Type during the COVID-19 Pandemic in China.新冠疫情期间中国夫妻关系的变化及其类型差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 30;19(19):12516. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912516.
5
Will you be happy for me? Associations between self-reported, perceived, and observed responses to positive events and sexual well-being in cohabiting couples.你会为我感到高兴吗?同居伴侣对积极事件的自我报告、感知和观察到的反应与性健康之间的关联。
J Soc Pers Relat. 2022 Aug;39(8):2454-2477. doi: 10.1177/02654075221080581. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
6
Couple Communication Behaviors During Sexual and Nonsexual Discussions and Their Association with Relationship Satisfaction.夫妻在性和非性话题讨论中的沟通行为及其与关系满意度的关系。
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Apr;51(3):1541-1557. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02204-4. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
7
Complex assessment of relationship quality within dyads.对二人关系质量进行复杂评估。
J Community Psychol. 2020 Sep;48(7):2221-2237. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22392.
8
Perceived Experiences of Discrimination and Latino/a Young Adults' Personal and Relational Well-being.感知到的歧视与拉丁裔青年的个人和人际关系幸福。
J Youth Adolesc. 2020 May;49(5):1017-1029. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-01175-z. Epub 2019 Nov 30.
9
Behind closed doors: How advanced cancer couples communicate at home.闭门家中谈:晚期癌症夫妇如何在家中交流。
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2019 Mar-Apr;37(2):228-241. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2018.1508535. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
10
Interpersonal mechanisms linking close relationships to health.人际关系机制将亲密关系与健康联系起来。
Am Psychol. 2017 Sep;72(6):531-542. doi: 10.1037/amp0000129.