Department of Plastic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
Acta Oncol. 2011 Oct;50(7):1053-61. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2011.584554. Epub 2011 Jul 11.
Reconstructing a breast mound constitutes the basis of breast reconstruction. The breast can be reconstructed using autologous tissue, implants or a combination thereof. The number of women wishing a breast reconstruction has increased, but evaluation of the results is lacking. The current study examined the long-term results from three methods of breast reconstruction to assess the subjective and the objective outcome.
Patients undergoing first-time post mastectomy reconstruction, selected from the cohort of Danish women in the Central and North Region of Denmark, were evaluated. We included 363 women, reconstructed in 1990-2005. Data was collected from patient charts, a study specific questionnaire (to be found online at http://www.informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/0284186X.2011.584554 ) and a clinical follow-up visit. The questionnaire included questions regarding demographic background and evaluation of the reconstructed breast and donor site. The clinical follow-up visit included an examination of the overall result and donor site.
The questionnaire was answered by 263 women, of whom 137 had an implant, 26 had a latissimus dorsi musculocutaneus flap and 100 had a pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneus flap. Women reconstructed with autologous tissue were significantly more pleased with the result of the breast reconstruction than women reconstructed with an implant. After a median of seven years, neither the patient's age nor the length of time since the reconstruction significantly affected the patients' opinion of the overall result. There was no difference in the incidences of minor complications among the different reconstructive methods. BMI, smoking and radiation therapy influenced the risk of complications. Objective evaluation of the 180 women participating in the follow-up visit was in agreement with data from the questionnaire.
The type of reconstruction had a significant long-term influence on patient satisfaction and the objective result. Women reconstructed with autologous tissue were significantly more pleased, and the objective outcome was assessed as superior.
乳房重建的基础是重建乳房丘。乳房可以通过自体组织、植入物或两者结合来重建。希望进行乳房重建的女性人数有所增加,但缺乏对结果的评估。本研究通过三种乳房重建方法来评估长期结果,以评估主观和客观结果。
从丹麦中部和北部地区的丹麦女性队列中选择接受首次乳房切除术后重建的患者进行评估。我们纳入了 363 名女性,她们在 1990 年至 2005 年间接受了重建。数据来自患者病历、专门的问卷调查(可在 http://www.informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/0284186X.2011.584554 上找到)和临床随访。问卷包括有关人口统计学背景和对重建乳房和供体部位的评估的问题。临床随访包括对整体结果和供体部位的检查。
263 名女性回答了问卷,其中 137 名女性接受了植入物,26 名女性接受了 Latissimus dorsi 肌皮瓣,100 名女性接受了 pedicled 横直肌腹皮瓣。接受自体组织重建的女性对乳房重建结果的满意度明显高于接受植入物重建的女性。中位数为 7 年后,患者年龄和重建后时间长短均不会显著影响患者对整体结果的看法。不同重建方法的轻微并发症发生率没有差异。BMI、吸烟和放射治疗影响并发症的风险。参加随访的 180 名女性的客观评估与问卷调查数据一致。
重建类型对患者满意度和客观结果有显著的长期影响。接受自体组织重建的女性满意度明显更高,客观结果评估也更好。