Department of Periodontology, School of Graduate Dentistry, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013 Feb;15(1):1-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00371.x. Epub 2011 Jul 11.
This preliminary investigation aimed to evaluate the potential of contaminated implants to reosseointegrate into pristine sites and, in addition, to assess the potential of osseointegration of new implants in peri-implantitis sockets in a canine model.
All mandibular premolars were bilaterally extracted from two mongrel dogs. Following 12 weeks of healing, two dental implants were inserted on each hemiarch. Forty-five days following implant placement, a silk ligature secured with cyanoacrylate was placed around the implants' cervical region in order to induce peri-implantitis. After another 45 days from ligature placement, the implants were mechanically removed using counter rotation with a ratchet and were reimplanted without any decontamination (neither rinsing nor chemical or mechanical cleaning) in adjacent pristine zones. In sites where implants were removed, new, wider-diameter implants were placed in the infected sockets. Forty-five days following reimplantation surgery, the dogs were sacrificed; nondecalcified specimens were processed and toluidine blue stained for morphologic and morphometric (bone-to-implant contact [BIC]) assessment under an optical microscope.
In dog 1 all the implants (both in the pristine and in the infected sites) survived and osseointegrated while in dog 2, six out of eight implants failed to osseointegrate and exfoliated. Overall, the mean BIC of all implants was 51.08% (SD 20.54). The mean BIC for the infected implants placed into pristine sites was 51.48% ± 26.29% (SD) and the mean BIC for the new implants in peri-implantitis socket was 50.58% ± 14.27% (SD).
Within the limitations of this preliminary investigation, especially the small number of animals, osseointegration seems to be achievable both in infected sites and around contaminated implant surfaces.
本初步研究旨在评估受污染种植体在原始部位重新骨整合的潜力,并评估在犬模型中,受感染种植体周围的种植体周围炎骨缺损内植入新种植体的骨整合潜力。
从两只杂种犬的双侧下颌前磨牙中提取所有下颌前磨牙。在愈合 12 周后,每个半弓上植入两颗牙种植体。种植体植入后 45 天,用氰基丙烯酸酯固定的丝线结扎物环绕种植体颈部,以诱导种植体周围炎。结扎物放置 45 天后,使用棘轮反向旋转的方式机械去除种植体,并在相邻的原始区域内无需任何去污(不冲洗、不进行化学或机械清洁)重新植入。在去除种植体的部位,将新的、直径更大的种植体放置在受感染的骨缺损内。重新植入手术后 45 天,处死犬;对非脱钙标本进行处理,并用甲苯胺蓝染色,在光学显微镜下进行形态学和形态计量学(骨-种植体接触[BIC])评估。
在犬 1 中,所有种植体(无论是在原始部位还是在感染部位)均存活并骨整合,而在犬 2 中,8 个种植体中有 6 个未能骨整合并脱落。总体而言,所有种植体的平均 BIC 为 51.08%(SD 20.54)。植入原始部位的感染种植体的平均 BIC 为 51.48%±26.29%(SD),植入种植体周围炎骨缺损内的新种植体的平均 BIC 为 50.58%±14.27%(SD)。
在本初步研究的限制内,尤其是动物数量较少的情况下,受感染部位和受污染种植体表面周围似乎都能实现骨整合。