Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Ann Fam Med. 2011 Jul-Aug;9(4):323-9. doi: 10.1370/afm.1278.
Care coordination is increasingly recognized as a necessary element of high-quality, patient-centered care. This study investigated (1) the association between care coordination and continuity of primary care, and (2) differences in this association by level of specialty care use.
We conducted a cross-sectional study of Medicare enrollees with select chronic conditions in an integrated health care delivery system in Washington State. We collected survey information on patient experiences and automated health care utilization data for 1 year preceding survey completion. Coordination was defined by the coordination measure from the short form of the Ambulatory Care Experiences Survey (ACES). Continuity was measured by primary care visit concentration. Patients who had 10 or more specialty care visits were classified as high users. Linear regression was used to estimate the association between coordination and continuity, controlling for potential confounders and clustering within clinicians. We used a continuity-by-specialty interaction term to determine whether the continuity-coordination association was modified by high specialty care use.
Among low specialty care users, an increase of 1 standard deviation (SD) in continuity was associated with an increase of 2.71 in the ACES coordination scale (P <.001). In high specialty care users, we observed no association between continuity and reported coordination (P= .77).
High use of specialty care may strain the ability of primary care clinicians to coordinate care effectively. Future studies should investigate care coordination interventions that allow for appropriate specialty care referrals without diminishing the ability of primary care physicians to manage overall patient care.
护理协调越来越被认为是高质量、以患者为中心的护理的必要组成部分。本研究调查了(1)护理协调与初级保健连续性之间的关联,以及(2)按专科护理使用水平的差异。
我们对华盛顿州综合医疗服务系统中患有特定慢性病的 Medicare 参保者进行了横断面研究。我们收集了患者体验的调查信息和调查完成前 1 年的自动医疗保健使用数据。协调由门诊护理体验调查(ACES)简短形式的协调措施定义。连续性通过初级保健就诊集中程度来衡量。专科就诊次数达到 10 次或以上的患者被归类为高使用患者。线性回归用于估计协调与连续性之间的关联,同时控制潜在混杂因素和临床医生内的聚类。我们使用连续性与专科的交互项来确定高专科护理使用是否改变了连续性-协调关联。
在低专科护理使用患者中,连续性每增加 1 个标准差(SD),ACES 协调量表增加 2.71(P <.001)。在高专科护理使用患者中,我们观察到连续性与报告的协调性之间没有关联(P=.77)。
高专科护理的使用可能会削弱初级保健临床医生有效协调护理的能力。未来的研究应调查护理协调干预措施,这些干预措施允许进行适当的专科护理转诊,而不会降低初级保健医生管理整体患者护理的能力。