Bayliss Elizabeth A, Ellis Jennifer L, Shoup Jo Ann, Zeng Chan, McQuillan Deanna B, Steiner John F
Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, Colorado Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado
Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, Colorado.
Ann Fam Med. 2015 Mar;13(2):123-9. doi: 10.1370/afm.1739.
Lower continuity of care has been associated with higher rates of adverse outcomes for persons with multiple chronic medical conditions. It is unclear, however, whether this relationship also exists within integrated systems that offer high levels of informational continuity through shared electronic health records.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 12,200 seniors with 3 or more chronic conditions within an integrated delivery system. Continuity of care was calculated using the Continuity of Care Index, which reflects visit concentration with individual clinicians. Using Cox proportional hazards regression permitting continuity to vary monthly until the outcome or censoring event, we separately assessed inpatient admissions and emergency department visits as a function of primary care continuity and specialty care continuity.
After adjusting for covariates (demographics; baseline, primary, and specialty care visits; baseline outcomes; and morbidity burden), greater primary care continuity and greater specialty care continuity were each associated with a lower risk of inpatient admission (respective hazard ratios (95% CIs) = 0.97 (0.96, 0.99) and 0.95 (0.93, 0.98)) and a lower risk of emergency department visits (respective hazard ratios = 0.97 (0.96, 0.98) and 0.98 (0.96, 1.00)). For the subgroup with 3 or more primary care and 3 or more specialty care visits, specialty care continuity (but not primary care continuity) was independently associated with a decreased risk of inpatient admissions (hazard ratio = 0.94 (0.92, 0.97)), and primary care continuity (but not specialty care continuity) was associated with a decreased risk of emergency department visits (hazard ratio = 0.98 (0.96, 1.00)).
In an integrated delivery system with high informational continuity, greater continuity of care is independently associated with lower hospital utilization for seniors with multiple chronic medical conditions. Different subgroups of patients will benefit from continuity with primary and specialty care clinicians depending on their care needs.
对于患有多种慢性疾病的患者而言,较低的医疗连续性与较高的不良结局发生率相关。然而,目前尚不清楚在通过共享电子健康记录提供高水平信息连续性的整合系统中,这种关系是否也存在。
我们对一个整合医疗系统内12200名患有3种或更多慢性疾病的老年人进行了一项回顾性队列研究。使用医疗连续性指数计算医疗连续性,该指数反映了与个体临床医生就诊的集中程度。通过允许连续性每月变化直至出现结局或审查事件的Cox比例风险回归,我们分别评估了住院入院和急诊科就诊情况作为初级保健连续性和专科护理连续性的函数。
在调整协变量(人口统计学;基线、初级和专科护理就诊;基线结局;以及发病负担)后,更高的初级保健连续性和更高的专科护理连续性均与较低的住院入院风险(各自的风险比(95%置信区间)=0.97(0.96,0.99)和0.95(0.93,0.98))以及较低的急诊科就诊风险(各自的风险比=0.97(0.96,0.98)和0.98(0.96,1.00))相关。对于有3次或更多初级保健就诊和3次或更多专科护理就诊的亚组,专科护理连续性(而非初级保健连续性)与住院入院风险降低独立相关(风险比=0.94(0.92,0.97)),而初级保健连续性(而非专科护理连续性)与急诊科就诊风险降低相关(风险比=0.98(0.96,1.00))。
在具有高信息连续性的整合医疗系统中,更高的医疗连续性与患有多种慢性疾病的老年人较低的医院利用率独立相关。不同的患者亚组将根据其护理需求从与初级和专科护理临床医生的连续性中受益。