Kim M, Wadke M
Department of Pathology, Muhlenberg Regional Medical Center, Plainfield, New Jersey 07061.
J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Nov;28(11):2511-3. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.11.2511-2513.1990.
The present study evaluated the Ventrescreen Mono enzyme immunoassay (Ventrex Laboratories) and Monolatex (Wampole Laboratories) for detection of infectious mononucleosis-specific heterophil antibodies by comparing test results on sera of 247 symptomatic patients. The purpose of this study was to compare not only the two different test systems but also the two different methods they represent for accuracy in detecting infectious mononucleosis-specific heterophil antibodies. Discrepancies in the test results of the two kits were arbitrated by determining the Epstein-Barr virus antibody profiles of the samples. The study showed that the Ventrescreen Mono enzyme immunoassay is as good as the Monolatex test for detecting heterophil antibodies. After discrepancies were resolved, the sensitivity and specificity of the Ventrescreen assay were 100 and 98%, respectively.
本研究通过比较247例有症状患者血清的检测结果,评估了Ventrescreen Mono酶免疫测定法(Ventrex实验室)和Monolatex(Wampole实验室)检测传染性单核细胞增多症特异性嗜异性抗体的能力。本研究的目的不仅是比较这两种不同的检测系统,还要比较它们所代表的两种不同方法在检测传染性单核细胞增多症特异性嗜异性抗体方面的准确性。通过测定样本的EB病毒抗体谱来仲裁两种试剂盒检测结果的差异。研究表明,Ventrescreen Mono酶免疫测定法在检测嗜异性抗体方面与Monolatex检测法一样好。在解决差异后,Ventrescreen测定法的敏感性和特异性分别为100%和98%。