Suppr超能文献

两种检测方法(酶免疫测定法和乳胶凝集法)用于检测传染性单核细胞增多症中嗜异性抗体的比较评估。

Comparative evaluation of two test methods (enzyme immunoassay and latex fixation) for the detection of heterophil antibodies in infectious mononucleosis.

作者信息

Kim M, Wadke M

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Muhlenberg Regional Medical Center, Plainfield, New Jersey 07061.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Nov;28(11):2511-3. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.11.2511-2513.1990.

Abstract

The present study evaluated the Ventrescreen Mono enzyme immunoassay (Ventrex Laboratories) and Monolatex (Wampole Laboratories) for detection of infectious mononucleosis-specific heterophil antibodies by comparing test results on sera of 247 symptomatic patients. The purpose of this study was to compare not only the two different test systems but also the two different methods they represent for accuracy in detecting infectious mononucleosis-specific heterophil antibodies. Discrepancies in the test results of the two kits were arbitrated by determining the Epstein-Barr virus antibody profiles of the samples. The study showed that the Ventrescreen Mono enzyme immunoassay is as good as the Monolatex test for detecting heterophil antibodies. After discrepancies were resolved, the sensitivity and specificity of the Ventrescreen assay were 100 and 98%, respectively.

摘要

本研究通过比较247例有症状患者血清的检测结果,评估了Ventrescreen Mono酶免疫测定法(Ventrex实验室)和Monolatex(Wampole实验室)检测传染性单核细胞增多症特异性嗜异性抗体的能力。本研究的目的不仅是比较这两种不同的检测系统,还要比较它们所代表的两种不同方法在检测传染性单核细胞增多症特异性嗜异性抗体方面的准确性。通过测定样本的EB病毒抗体谱来仲裁两种试剂盒检测结果的差异。研究表明,Ventrescreen Mono酶免疫测定法在检测嗜异性抗体方面与Monolatex检测法一样好。在解决差异后,Ventrescreen测定法的敏感性和特异性分别为100%和98%。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
The history of infectious mononucleosis.传染性单核细胞增多症的历史。
Am J Med Sci. 1974 Mar;267(3):189-95. doi: 10.1097/00000441-197403000-00006.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验