Justan I
Department of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic.
Acta Chir Plast. 2010;52(2-4):45-8.
The purpose of our study was to indentify the mechanical characteristics of various suture materials. We created an in-vitro experimental flexor tendon model.
Materials were divided into four groups: monofilament polypropylene non-absorbable material (group 1); monofilament long-term absorbable material (group 2); polyester multifilament non-absorbable coated material (group 3) and polyester multifilament non-absorbable uncoated material (group 4). We performed 135 tests. The mean maximal tensile strength was 62.92 N in group 1, 75.20 N in group 2, 36.38 N in group 3 and 72.4 N in group 4. Elasticity in millimetres was adjusted at the 35N level: group 1:2.01 mm, group 2:2.18 mm, group 3:2.14 and group 4:1.51 mm.
With regard to its elasticity and favourable SD for tensile strength measurements, polyester multifilament non-absorbable uncoated material was considered to be the most suitable material.
我们研究的目的是确定各种缝合材料的力学特性。我们创建了一个体外实验性屈肌腱模型。
材料分为四组:单丝聚丙烯不可吸收材料(第1组);单丝长效可吸收材料(第2组);聚酯复丝不可吸收涂层材料(第3组)和聚酯复丝不可吸收未涂层材料(第4组)。我们进行了135次测试。第1组的平均最大拉伸强度为62.92牛,第2组为75.20牛,第3组为36.38牛,第4组为72.4牛。在35牛水平下调整毫米级的弹性:第1组:2.01毫米,第2组:2.18毫米,第3组:2.14毫米,第4组:1.51毫米。
就其弹性和拉伸强度测量的良好标准差而言,聚酯复丝不可吸收未涂层材料被认为是最合适的材料。