Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Nov;26(11):1329-35. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1799-1. Epub 2011 Jul 13.
Previous research has shown a socioeconomic status (SES) gradient in the receipt of cardiac services following acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but much less is known about SES and the use of secondary preventive medicines following AMI.
To examine the role of income in initiation of treatment with ACE-inhibitors, beta-blockers and statins in the 120 days following discharge from hospital for first AMI.
A cross-sectional study with a population-based cohort.
First-time AMI patients between age 40 and 100 discharged alive from the hospital and surviving at least 120 days following discharge between January 1, 1999 and September 3, 2006.
Binary variables indicating whether the patient had filled at least one prescription for each of the medicines of interest.
Our results reveal a significant and positive income gradient with initiation of the guideline-recommended medicines among male AMI patients. Men in the third income quintile and above were significantly more likely to initiate treatment with any of the medicines than those in the first quintile, with those in the fifth income quintile having 37%, 50% and 71% higher odds of initiating ACE-inhibitors, beta-blockers and statins, respectively, than men in the lowest income quintile [OR = 1.37 95% CI (1.24, 1.51); OR = 1.50 95% CI (1.35, 1.68); and OR = 1.71 95% CI (1.53, 190)]. The gradient was not present among women, although women in the fifth income quintile were more likely to initiate beta-blockers and statins than women in the lowest income quintile [OR = 1.25 95% CI (1.06, 1.47) and OR = 1.32 95% CI (1.12, 1.54)].
There were inequities in treatment following AMI in the form of a clear and often significant gradient between income and initiation of evidence-based pharmacologic therapies among male patients. This gradient persisted despite significant changes in coverage levels for the costs of these medicines.
先前的研究表明,在急性心肌梗死(AMI)后接受心脏服务方面存在社会经济地位(SES)梯度,但对于 SES 和 AMI 后二级预防药物的使用知之甚少。
研究收入在出院后 120 天内开始使用 ACE 抑制剂、β 受体阻滞剂和他汀类药物治疗首次 AMI 的作用。
一项基于人群的队列的横断面研究。
1999 年 1 月 1 日至 2006 年 9 月 3 日期间年龄在 40 至 100 岁之间出院并存活至少 120 天的首次 AMI 患者。
表示患者是否至少开了一种感兴趣药物的二进制变量。
我们的研究结果显示,在男性 AMI 患者中,收入与指南推荐药物的起始之间存在显著的正相关。第三收入五分位及以上的男性患者与第一五分位的男性患者相比,更有可能开始使用任何药物治疗,其中第五收入五分位的男性患者开始使用 ACE 抑制剂、β 受体阻滞剂和他汀类药物的几率分别比收入最低五分位的男性患者高 37%、50%和 71%[比值比(OR)=1.37,95%可信区间(CI)(1.24,1.51);OR=1.50,95%CI(1.35,1.68);OR=1.71,95%CI(1.53,190)]。这一梯度在女性中并不存在,尽管第五收入五分位的女性比最低收入五分位的女性更有可能开始使用β受体阻滞剂和他汀类药物[OR=1.25,95%CI(1.06,1.47)和 OR=1.32,95%CI(1.12,1.54)]。
在男性患者中,基于收入的治疗存在明显的不平等,即收入与启动基于证据的药物治疗之间存在明显且通常显著的梯度,尽管这些药物的费用覆盖水平发生了重大变化。