Suppr超能文献

在胶质瘤大鼠模型中进行血管大小指数测量:动态(钆)和稳态(氧化铁)磁化率对比 MRI 方法的比较。

Vessel size index measurements in a rat model of glioma: comparison of the dynamic (Gd) and steady-state (iron-oxide) susceptibility contrast MRI approaches.

机构信息

Inserm, U836, Grenoble, F-38042, France.

出版信息

NMR Biomed. 2012 Feb;25(2):218-26. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1734. Epub 2011 Jul 12.

Abstract

Vessel size index (VSI), a parameter related to the distribution of vessel diameters, may be estimated using two MRI approaches: (i) dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI following the injection of a bolus of Gd-chelate. This technique is routinely applied in the clinic to assess intracranial tissue perfusion in patients; (ii) steady-state susceptibility contrast with USPIO contrast agents, which is considered here as the standard method. Such agents are not available for human yet and the steady-state approach is currently limited to animal studies. The aim is to compare VSI estimates obtained with these two approaches on rats bearing C6 glioma (n = 7). In a first session, VSI was estimated from two consecutive injections of Gd-Chelate (Gd(1) and Gd(2)). In a second session (4 hours later), VSI was estimated using USPIO. Our findings indicate that both approaches yield comparable VSI estimates both in contralateral (VSI{USPIO} = 7.5 ± 2.0 µm, VSI{Gd(1)} = 6.5 ± 0.7 µm) and in brain tumour tissues (VSI{USPIO} = 19.4 ± 7.1 µm, VSI{Gd(1)} = 16.6 ± 4.5 µm). We also observed that, in the presence of BBB leakage (as it occurs typically in brain tumours), applying a preload of Gd-chelate improves the VSI estimate with the DSC approach both in contralateral (VSI{Gd(2)} = 7.1 ± 0.4 µm) and in brain tumour tissues (VSI{Gd(2)} = 18.5 ± 4.3 µm) but is not mandatory. VSI estimates do not appear to be sensitive to T(1) changes related to Gd extravasation. These results suggest that robust VSI estimates may be obtained in patients at 3 T or higher magnetic fields with the DSC approach.

摘要

血管大小指数(VSI)是与血管直径分布相关的参数,可以通过两种 MRI 方法进行估计:(i)注射钆螯合物后的动态磁化率对比(DSC)MRI。该技术常用于临床评估患者颅内组织灌注;(ii)使用超顺磁性氧化铁(USPIO)对比剂的稳态磁化率对比,这里将其视为标准方法。但此类对比剂目前尚未应用于人体,且稳态方法目前仅限于动物研究。本研究旨在比较两种方法在 C6 神经胶质瘤荷瘤大鼠(n=7)上的 VSI 估计值。在第一次实验中,通过连续两次注射 Gd-Chelate(Gd(1) 和 Gd(2))来估计 VSI。在第二次实验(4 小时后)中,使用 USPIO 来估计 VSI。研究结果表明,两种方法在对侧(VSI{USPIO}=7.5±2.0 µm,VSI{Gd(1)}=6.5±0.7 µm)和脑肿瘤组织(VSI{USPIO}=19.4±7.1 µm,VSI{Gd(1)}=16.6±4.5 µm)中都能得到可比较的 VSI 估计值。我们还观察到,在 BBB 渗漏(如脑肿瘤中常见)的情况下,应用 Gd 螯合物预加载可以提高 DSC 方法在对侧(VSI{Gd(2)}=7.1±0.4 µm)和脑肿瘤组织(VSI{Gd(2)}=18.5±4.3 µm)中的 VSI 估计值,但并非必需。VSI 估计值似乎不受与 Gd 外渗相关的 T(1)变化的影响。这些结果表明,在 3T 或更高磁场强度的患者中,DSC 方法可能获得可靠的 VSI 估计值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验