Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa 31905, Israel.
Res Dev Disabil. 2011 Nov-Dec;32(6):2608-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.06.014. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
The objectives of this study were to describe the nature of the attention deficits in children with Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) in comparison with typically developing (TD) children, using the Virtual Classroom (VC), and to assess the utility of this instrument for detecting attention deficits. Twenty-nine NF1 children and 25 age-and gender-matched controls, aged 8-16, were assessed in a VC. Parents' ratings on the Conners' Parent Rating Scales-Revised: Long (CPRS-R:L) questionnaire were used to screen for Attention Deficit-Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Significant differences were found between the NF1 and the control groups on the number of targets correctly identified (omission errors) and the number of commissions (commission errors) in the VC, with poorer performance by the NF1 children (p < 0.005). Significant correlations were obtained between the number of targets correctly identified, the number of commission errors, and the reaction time. Significant correlations were also found between the total correct hits and the cognitive problems/inattention scale, as well as two other indexes of the CPRS-R:L: the DSM-IV Symptoms Subscale and the ADHD Index. The VC results support the hypothesis that NF1 is marked by inattention and impulsivity and that participants with NF1 are more inattentive (omission errors) and impulsive (commission errors) than normal controls. The VC appears to be a sensitive and ecologically valid assessment tool for use in the diagnosis of attention deficits among children with NF1.
本研究旨在描述 1 型神经纤维瘤病(NF1)儿童的注意力缺陷的性质,并与正常发育(TD)儿童进行比较,使用虚拟教室(VC),并评估该工具检测注意力缺陷的效用。29 名 NF1 儿童和 25 名年龄和性别匹配的对照儿童,年龄在 8-16 岁之间,在 VC 中进行了评估。父母使用 Conners' Parent Rating Scales-Revised:Long(CPRS-R:L)问卷对注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)进行了筛查。在 VC 中,NF1 组和对照组在正确识别目标的数量(遗漏错误)和错误数量(错误)方面存在显著差异,NF1 儿童的表现较差(p<0.005)。在正确识别的目标数量、错误数量和反应时间之间获得了显著的相关性。在总正确命中数和认知问题/注意力不集中量表之间,以及 CPRS-R:L 的另外两个指标之间,即 DSM-IV 症状子量表和 ADHD 指数之间,也发现了显著的相关性。VC 结果支持 NF1 表现出注意力不集中和冲动的假设,并且 NF1 参与者比正常对照组更不注意(遗漏错误)和冲动(错误)。VC 似乎是一种敏感且具有生态有效性的评估工具,可用于诊断 NF1 儿童的注意力缺陷。