• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

福利个案工作者评估和家庭暴力服务:行政数据和案例叙述的结果。

Welfare caseworker assessments and domestic violence services: findings from administrative data and case narratives.

机构信息

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.

出版信息

Violence Against Women. 2011 Aug;17(8):1046-66. doi: 10.1177/1077801211414928. Epub 2011 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1177/1077801211414928
PMID:21757434
Abstract

The Family Violence Option (FVO) protects welfare recipients who are domestic violence victims or survivors by providing service referrals and waivers from certain requirements. Implementation of the FVO has been difficult for welfare agencies and disclosures and service uptake have been low. Using administrative data and caseworker notes, this study compares demographic and case characteristics and abuse experiences among four analytic groups. Although differences in demographics are most pronounced between victims and nonvictims, experiences with abuse and services differed between victims who received waivers versus those who did not. Findings indicate that caseworkers may base service decisions on abuse experiences.

摘要

家庭暴力选择项(FVO)通过提供服务转介和免除某些要求,保护家庭暴力受害者或幸存者的福利受助人。福利机构在实施家庭暴力选择项方面遇到了困难,披露和服务利用率一直很低。本研究使用行政数据和个案工作者的记录,比较了四个分析组的人口统计学和案例特征以及虐待经历。尽管受害者和非受害者之间的人口统计学差异最为明显,但获得豁免的受害者和未获得豁免的受害者的虐待经历和服务也有所不同。研究结果表明,个案工作者可能会根据虐待经历做出服务决策。

相似文献

1
Welfare caseworker assessments and domestic violence services: findings from administrative data and case narratives.福利个案工作者评估和家庭暴力服务:行政数据和案例叙述的结果。
Violence Against Women. 2011 Aug;17(8):1046-66. doi: 10.1177/1077801211414928. Epub 2011 Jul 13.
2
Improving services for lesbian clients: what do domestic violence agencies need to do?改善为女同性恋客户提供的服务:家庭暴力机构需要做些什么?
Health Care Women Int. 2006 Apr;27(4):344-61. doi: 10.1080/07399330500511725.
3
Characteristics of women who do and do not receive onsite shelter services from domestic violence programs.接受和不接受家庭暴力项目现场庇护服务的女性特征。
Violence Against Women. 2011 Aug;17(8):1024-45. doi: 10.1177/1077801211414169. Epub 2011 Jul 8.
4
"Missing" domestic violence victims in welfare caseloads: the discrepancy between administrative and survey disclosure rates.
J Health Soc Policy. 2006;22(2):79-95. doi: 10.1300/J045v22n02_05.
5
Predicting women's perceptions of domestic violence and sexual assault agency helpfulness: what matters to program clients?预测女性对家庭暴力和性侵犯服务机构帮助程度的看法:对项目客户来说什么最重要?
Violence Against Women. 2007 Nov;13(11):1149-78. doi: 10.1177/1077801207307799.
6
Frontline worker responses to domestic violence disclosure in public welfare offices.一线工作者对公共福利办公室中家庭暴力披露的反应。
Soc Work. 2010 Jul;55(3):235-43. doi: 10.1093/sw/55.3.235.
7
Domestic violence in the second half of life.晚年的家庭暴力
J Elder Abuse Negl. 2009 Apr;21(2):141-55. doi: 10.1080/08946560902779951.
8
Effects of coordinated services for drug-abusing women who are victims of intimate partner violence.针对遭受亲密伴侣暴力的吸毒女性的协调服务的效果。
Violence Against Women. 2007 Apr;13(4):395-411. doi: 10.1177/1077801207299189.
9
Double jeopardy: a comparison of persons with and without disabilities who were victims of sexual abuse and/or sexual assault.双重困境:有残疾和无残疾的性虐待和/或性侵犯受害者的比较
J Soc Work Disabil Rehabil. 2008;7(1):19-46. doi: 10.1080/15367100802009715.
10
Welfare reform and women's health: review of the literature and implications for state policy.福利改革与妇女健康:文献综述及对国家政策的影响
J Public Health Policy. 1998;19(4):420-46.

引用本文的文献

1
Women's Lived Experiences with Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF): How TANF Can Better Support Women's Wellbeing and Reduce Intimate Partner Violence.妇女对贫困家庭临时援助 (TANF) 的真实体验:TANF 如何更好地支持妇女的幸福和减少亲密伴侣暴力。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 21;19(3):1170. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031170.