The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2011 Jul;42(3):309-19. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2011/10-0040).
The purpose of this article is to provide information that will assist readers in understanding and interpreting research literature on the role of auditory processing in communication disorders.
A narrative review was used to summarize and synthesize the literature on auditory processing deficits in children with auditory processing disorder (APD), specific language impairment (SLI), and dyslexia. The history of auditory processing theories of these 3 disorders is described, points of convergence and controversy within and among the different branches of research literature are considered, and the influence of research on practice is discussed. The theoretical and clinical contributions of neurophysiological methods are also reviewed, and suggested approaches for critical reading of the research literature are provided.
Research on the role of auditory processing in communication disorders springs from a variety of theoretical perspectives and assumptions, and this variety, combined with controversies over the interpretation of research results, makes it difficult to draw clinical implications from the literature. Neurophysiological research methods are a promising route to better understanding of auditory processing. Progress in theory development and its clinical application is most likely to be made when researchers from different disciplines and theoretical perspectives communicate clearly and combine the strengths of their approaches.
本文旨在为读者提供有关听觉处理在沟通障碍中的作用的研究文献的信息,以帮助读者理解和解释。
采用叙述性综述的方法,对听觉处理障碍(APD)、特定语言障碍(SLI)和诵读困难儿童的听觉处理缺陷的文献进行总结和综合。描述了这 3 种疾病的听觉处理理论的历史,考虑了不同研究文献分支之间和内部的趋同点和争议点,并讨论了研究对实践的影响。还回顾了神经生理学方法的理论和临床贡献,并提供了批判性阅读研究文献的建议方法。
有关听觉处理在沟通障碍中的作用的研究源于各种理论观点和假设,这种多样性,加上对研究结果的解释存在争议,使得很难从文献中得出临床意义。神经生理学研究方法是更好地理解听觉处理的有前途的途径。当来自不同学科和理论观点的研究人员清晰地沟通并结合他们方法的优势时,理论发展和临床应用的进展最有可能取得。