Suppr超能文献

阅读障碍儿童脑干颞叶处理与中枢听觉功能测试表现之间的关系。

The relationship between brainstem temporal processing and performance on tests of central auditory function in children with reading disorders.

机构信息

The University of South Dakota, Vermillion, USA.

出版信息

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011 Feb;54(1):228-42. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0239). Epub 2010 Aug 5.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Studies using speech stimuli to elicit electrophysiologic responses have found approximately 30% of children with language-based learning problems demonstrate abnormal brainstem timing. Research is needed regarding how these responses relate to performance on behavioral tests of central auditory function. The purpose of the study was to investigate performance of children with dyslexia with and without abnormal brainstem timing and children with no history of learning or related disorders on behavioral tests of central auditory function.

METHOD

Performance of 30 school-age children on behavioral central auditory tests in common clinical use was examined: Group 1 (n = 10): dyslexia, abnormal brainstem timing; Group 2 (n = 10): dyslexia, normal brainstem timing; Group 3 (n = 10): typical controls.

RESULTS

Results indicated that all participants in Group 2 met diagnostic criteria for (central) auditory processing disorder [(C)APD], whereas only 4 participants in Group 1 met criteria. The Biological Marker of Auditory Processing (BioMARK) identified 6 children in Group 1 who did not meet diagnostic criteria for (C)APD but displayed abnormal brainstem timing.

CONCLUSIONS

Results underscore the importance of central auditory assessment for children with dyslexia. Furthermore, the BioMARK may be useful in identifying children with central auditory dysfunction who would not have been identified using behavioral methods of (C)APD assessment.

摘要

目的

使用语音刺激来引出电生理反应的研究发现,大约 30%的语言学习障碍儿童表现出异常的脑干时间。需要研究这些反应与中枢听觉功能行为测试表现之间的关系。本研究旨在探讨伴或不伴异常脑干时间的阅读障碍儿童以及无学习或相关障碍史的儿童在中枢听觉功能行为测试中的表现。

方法

检查了 30 名学龄儿童在常用临床中枢听觉测试中的表现:第 1 组(n = 10):阅读障碍,异常脑干时间;第 2 组(n = 10):阅读障碍,正常脑干时间;第 3 组(n = 10):典型对照组。

结果

结果表明,第 2 组的所有参与者均符合(中枢)听觉处理障碍的诊断标准[(C)APD],而第 1 组只有 4 名参与者符合标准。听觉处理生物标志物(BioMARK)识别出第 1 组中的 6 名儿童不符合(C)APD 的诊断标准,但表现出异常的脑干时间。

结论

结果强调了对阅读障碍儿童进行中枢听觉评估的重要性。此外,BioMARK 可能有助于识别不符合行为(C)APD 评估方法的中枢听觉功能障碍儿童。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验