不同在线心率监测系统的科学比较。
Scientific comparison of different online heart rate monitoring systems.
作者信息
Schönfelder Martin, Hinterseher Georg, Peter Philipp, Spitzenpfeil Peter
机构信息
Institute of Public Health Research, Technical University of Munich, Connollystraße 32, 80809 Munich, Germany.
出版信息
Int J Telemed Appl. 2011;2011:631848. doi: 10.1155/2011/631848. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
Recent technical development focused on real-time heart rate monitoring instead of postexercise evaluation of recorded data. There are several systems on the market that allow direct and real-time monitoring of several individuals at the same time. The present study compared the systems of Polar, Acentas, Activio, and Suunto in a field test with twelve subjects regarding failure quota, operating distance, and ECG validity. Moreover, the installation and use of software and hardware were evaluated with a quality rating system. Chest belts were evaluated with a questionnaire, too. Overall the system of Acentas reached the best mark of all systems, but detailed results showed that every system has its advantages and disadvantages depending on using purpose, location, and weather. So this evaluation cannot recommend a single system but rather shows strength and weakness of all systems and additionally can be used for further system improvements.
最近的技术发展集中在实时心率监测上，而非对记录数据进行运动后评估。市场上有几种系统能够同时对多个人进行直接和实时监测。本研究在一项实地测试中，针对故障配额、操作距离和心电图有效性，对12名受试者比较了博能（Polar）、阿辛塔斯（Acentas）、阿克蒂维奥（Activio）和颂拓（Suunto）的系统。此外，还使用质量评级系统对软件和硬件的安装及使用进行了评估。也通过问卷调查对胸带进行了评估。总体而言，阿辛塔斯系统在所有系统中得分最高，但详细结果表明，每个系统根据使用目的、地点和天气都有其优缺点。因此，本评估并非推荐单一系统，而是展示了所有系统的优势和劣势，此外还可用于进一步改进系统。
Zotero 插件