• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探讨期刊编辑撤回文章的原因和方式:一项定性研究的结果。

Exploring why and how journal editors retract articles: findings from a qualitative study.

机构信息

University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Mar;19(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9292-0. Epub 2011 Jul 15.

DOI:10.1007/s11948-011-9292-0
PMID:21761244
Abstract

Editors have a responsibility to retract seriously flawed articles from their journals. However, there appears to be little consistency in journals' policies or procedures for this. In a qualitative study, we therefore interviewed editors of science journals using semi-structured interviews to investigate their experience of retracting articles. We identified potential barriers to retraction, difficulties in the process and also sources of support and encouragement. Our findings have been used as the basis for guidelines developed by the Committee on Publication Ethics.

摘要

编辑有责任从其期刊中撤回有严重缺陷的文章。然而,期刊在这方面的政策或程序似乎几乎没有一致性。因此,在一项定性研究中,我们使用半结构化访谈采访了科学期刊的编辑,以调查他们撤回文章的经验。我们确定了撤回的潜在障碍、过程中的困难以及支持和鼓励的来源。我们的研究结果已被出版道德委员会制定的指南所采用。

相似文献

1
Exploring why and how journal editors retract articles: findings from a qualitative study.探讨期刊编辑撤回文章的原因和方式:一项定性研究的结果。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Mar;19(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9292-0. Epub 2011 Jul 15.
2
Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988-2008.为何以及如何期刊撤回文章?对 Medline 1988-2008 年撤稿的分析。
J Med Ethics. 2011 Sep;37(9):567-70. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.040964. Epub 2011 Apr 12.
3
Anaesthetics journals retract further articles after ethics approval is found lacking.在发现伦理审批存在缺陷后,麻醉学杂志又撤回了更多文章。
BMJ. 2012 Mar 13;344:e2019. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2019.
4
Retraction policies of top scientific journals ranked by impact factor.按影响因子排名的顶级科学期刊的撤稿政策。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2015 Jul;103(3):136-9. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.103.3.006.
5
Improving biomedical journals' ethical policies: the case of research misconduct.改进生物医学期刊的伦理政策:科研不端行为案例
J Med Ethics. 2014 Sep;40(9):644-6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101822. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
6
Fate of articles that warranted retraction due to ethical concerns: a descriptive cross-sectional study.因伦理问题而需撤回的文章的去向:一项描述性横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 22;9(1):e85846. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085846. eCollection 2014.
7
Consensus statement on the adoption of the COPE guidelines.关于采用《出版伦理委员会(COPE)指南》的共识声明。
Am J Surg. 2010 Jul;200(1):1. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.06.001.
8
Retraction (mal)practices of elite marketing and social psychology journals in the Dirk Smeesters' research misconduct case.在德克·斯梅斯特斯研究不当行为案件中,精英营销与社会心理学期刊的撤稿(不当)行为
Account Res. 2024 Oct;31(7):751-766. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2164489. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
9
Science journal editors' views on publication ethics: results of an international survey.科学期刊编辑对出版伦理的看法:一项国际调查结果
J Med Ethics. 2009 Jun;35(6):348-53. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.028324.
10
[The management of errors and scientific fraud by biomedical journals: They cannot replace Institutions].生物医学期刊对错误和科学欺诈的管理:它们无法取代机构
Presse Med. 2012 Sep;41(9 Pt 1):853-60. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2012.05.009. Epub 2012 Jul 24.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review of ENT retractions.耳鼻喉科手术牵拉的系统评价。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Feb;282(2):1041-1048. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08980-8. Epub 2024 Oct 14.
2
Research Integrity: Where We Are and Where We Are Heading.研究诚信:我们的现状与未来走向。
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Dec 4;38(47):e405. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e405.
3
Encouraging responsible reporting practices in the Instructions to Authors of neuroscience and physiology journals: There is room to improve.鼓励神经科学和生理学期刊《作者须知》中负责任的报告实践:有改进的空间。

本文引用的文献

1
Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988-2008.为何以及如何期刊撤回文章?对 Medline 1988-2008 年撤稿的分析。
J Med Ethics. 2011 Sep;37(9):567-70. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.040964. Epub 2011 Apr 12.
2
Déjà vu--a study of duplicate citations in Medline.似曾相识——对医学在线数据库(Medline)中重复引用的一项研究。
Bioinformatics. 2008 Jan 15;24(2):243-9. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm574. Epub 2007 Dec 1.
3
Retractions in the research literature: misconduct or mistakes?科研文献中的撤稿:是不当行为还是失误?
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 30;18(3):e0283753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283753. eCollection 2023.
4
Reducing the Inadvertent Spread of Retracted Science: recommendations from the RISRS report.减少撤回科学文献的意外传播:RISRS报告的建议
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2022 Sep 19;7(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s41073-022-00125-x.
5
Research ethics: a profile of retractions from world class universities.研究伦理:世界一流大学撤稿情况概述
Scientometrics. 2021;126(8):6871-6889. doi: 10.1007/s11192-021-03987-y. Epub 2021 May 23.
6
Journals' instructions to authors: A cross-sectional study across scientific disciplines.期刊作者须知:跨越科学学科的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 5;14(9):e0222157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222157. eCollection 2019.
7
Retraction of papers authored by Yuhji Saitoh - Beyond the Fujii phenomenon.齐藤雄二所著论文的撤稿——超越藤井现象
Indian J Anaesth. 2019 Jul;63(7):571-584. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_267_19.
8
Correcting duplicate publications: follow up study of MEDLINE tagged duplications.纠正重复发表的问题:对 MEDLINE 标记重复的随访研究。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2019 Feb 15;29(1):010201. doi: 10.11613/BM.2019.010201. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
9
Resolving authorship disputes by mediation and arbitration.通过调解和仲裁解决作者身份纠纷。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2018 Nov 16;3:12. doi: 10.1186/s41073-018-0057-z. eCollection 2018.
10
The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles.科学不端行为的可见性:对撤稿期刊文章相关文献的综述
Curr Sociol. 2017 Oct;65(6):814-845. doi: 10.1177/0011392116663807. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
Med J Aust. 2006 Aug 7;185(3):152-4. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00504.x.
4
Research misconduct, retraction, and cleansing the medical literature: lessons from the Poehlman case.科研不端行为、撤稿与医学文献净化:波埃尔曼案的教训
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Apr 18;144(8):609-13. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-8-200604180-00123. Epub 2006 Mar 6.
5
Phenomena of retraction: reasons for retraction and citations to the publications.撤稿现象:撤稿原因及对相关出版物的引用情况
JAMA. 1998 Jul 15;280(3):296-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.3.296.