Faulkes Zen
Department of Biology, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, 1201 West University Drive, Edinburg, TX 78539 USA.
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2018 Nov 16;3:12. doi: 10.1186/s41073-018-0057-z. eCollection 2018.
Disputes over authorship are increasing. This paper examines the options that researchers have in resolving authorship disputes. Discussions about authorship disputes often address how to prevent disputes but rarely address how to resolve them. Both individuals and larger research communities are harmed by the limited options for dispute resolution.
When authorship disputes arise after publication, most existing guidelines recommend that the authors work out the disputes between themselves. But this is unlikely to occur, because there are often large power differentials between team members, and institutions (e.g., universities, funding agencies) are unlikely to have authority over all team members. Other collaborative disciplines that deal with issues of collaborative creator credit could provide models for scientific authorship. Arbitration or mediation could provide solutions to authorship disputes where few presently exist. Because authors recognize journals' authority to make decisions about manuscripts submitted to the journal, journals are well placed to facilitate alternative dispute resolution processes.
Rather than viewing authorship disputes as rare events that must be handled on a case by case basis, researchers and journals should view the potential for disputes as predictable, preventable, and soluble. Independent bodies that can offer alternative dispute resolution services to scientific collaborators and/or journals could quickly help research communities, particularly their most vulnerable members.
关于作者身份的争议日益增多。本文探讨了研究人员在解决作者身份争议时可采用的方法。关于作者身份争议的讨论通常侧重于如何预防争议,而很少涉及如何解决争议。解决争议的选择有限,这对个人和更大的研究群体都造成了损害。
当作者身份争议在论文发表后出现时,大多数现有指南建议作者自行解决争议。但这种情况不太可能发生,因为团队成员之间往往存在很大的权力差异,而且机构(如大学、资助机构)不太可能对所有团队成员拥有权威。其他处理合作创作者署名问题的协作学科可以为科学作者身份提供模式。仲裁或调解可以为目前几乎不存在此类解决方案的作者身份争议提供解决办法。由于作者认可期刊对提交给该期刊的稿件做出决定的权力,期刊非常适合促进替代性争议解决程序。
研究人员和期刊不应将作者身份争议视为罕见事件,必须逐案处理,而应将争议的可能性视为可预测、可预防和可解决的。能够为科研合作者和/或期刊提供替代性争议解决服务的独立机构可以迅速帮助研究群体,尤其是其中最脆弱的成员。