Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences Division, Portland VA Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2011 Jul-Aug;33(4):354-62. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2011.04.005. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
The objective of the study was to evaluate the validity of the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) when used to measure depression in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV).
Factor analysis was utilized to validate the BDI-II in a sample of 671 patients with HCV recruited from a large Veterans Affairs medical center. The data were split randomly: the first half was subjected to exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis was used with the second half to confirm the model. Diagnostic data were retrieved from the electronic medical records.
Subjects were 97.0% male, average age was 52.8 years, 16.1% had a cirrhosis diagnosis, 62.9% had a current major depressive disorder diagnosis, and 42.3% endorsed significant depressive symptoms on the BDI-II. A two-factor model was an excellent fit for the data; the factors were labeled Cognitive-Affective and Somatic. Patients scored significantly higher on the Somatic factor than on the Cognitive-Affective factor (P<.001), and this discrepancy increased when comparing patients based on whether they had a diagnosis of cirrhosis.
When screening for depression in HCV patients, questions targeting cognitive and affective symptoms of depression may provide a more valid measurement of depression than questions targeting somatic symptoms of depression, particularly for patients with more advanced liver disease.
本研究旨在评估贝克抑郁自评量表第二版(BDI-II)在评估丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)患者抑郁症状时的有效性。
采用因子分析方法,对从一家大型退伍军人事务医疗中心招募的 671 名 HCV 患者进行 BDI-II 的验证。数据随机分为两半:前一半进行探索性因子分析,后一半采用验证性因子分析来验证模型。诊断数据从电子病历中提取。
受试者中 97.0%为男性,平均年龄为 52.8 岁,16.1%被诊断为肝硬化,62.9%目前患有重度抑郁症,42.3%在 BDI-II 上有明显的抑郁症状。双因素模型非常适合数据;这两个因素分别被标记为认知-情感和躯体。躯体因子的评分显著高于认知-情感因子(P<.001),并且当根据是否患有肝硬化对患者进行比较时,这种差异会增加。
在对 HCV 患者进行抑郁筛查时,针对抑郁的认知和情感症状的问题可能比针对躯体症状的问题提供更有效的抑郁测量,特别是对于肝脏疾病更严重的患者。