• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

锚定的尺度扭曲理论。

A scale distortion theory of anchoring.

机构信息

School of Management, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 Feb;141(1):124-33. doi: 10.1037/a0024006. Epub 2011 Jul 18.

DOI:10.1037/a0024006
PMID:21767047
Abstract

We propose that anchoring is often best interpreted as a scaling effect--that the anchor changes how the response scale is used, not how the focal stimulus is perceived. Of importance, we maintain that this holds true even for so-called objective scales (e.g., pounds, calories, meters, etc.). In support of this theory of scale distortion, we show that prior exposure to a numeric standard changes respondents' use of that specific response scale but does not generalize to conceptually affiliated judgments rendered on similar scales. Our findings highlight the necessity of distinguishing response language effects from representational effects in places where the need for that distinction has often been assumed away.

摘要

我们提出,锚定通常最好被解释为一种缩放效应——即锚定改变了响应范围的使用方式,而不是改变了对焦点刺激的感知方式。重要的是,我们认为即使是所谓的客观尺度(例如磅、卡路里、米等)也是如此。为了支持这种尺度扭曲理论,我们表明,先验接触数字标准会改变被试对特定响应范围的使用,但不会推广到在类似尺度上做出的概念上相关的判断。我们的研究结果强调了在需要区分反应语言效应和表示效应的地方,区分这两种效应的必要性,而这种区分在很多情况下往往被忽略了。

相似文献

1
A scale distortion theory of anchoring.锚定的尺度扭曲理论。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 Feb;141(1):124-33. doi: 10.1037/a0024006. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
2
Anchoring effects in the judgment of confidence: semantic or numeric priming?信心判断中的锚定效应:语义启动还是数字启动?
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Feb;71(2):297-307. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.2.297.
3
A common light-prior for visual search, shape, and reflectance judgments.一种用于视觉搜索、形状和反射率判断的常见光先验。
J Vis. 2007 Aug 31;7(11):11.1-7. doi: 10.1167/7.11.11.
4
Anchors aweigh: a demonstration of cross-modality anchoring and magnitude priming.起锚:跨模态锚定与量级启动的演示。
Cognition. 2008 Jan;106(1):13-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.008. Epub 2007 Feb 6.
5
Inverted-U effects generalize to the judgment of subjective properties of faces.倒U型效应适用于对面部主观属性的判断。
Percept Psychophys. 2008 Oct;70(7):1274-88. doi: 10.3758/PP.70.7.1274.
6
Effects of accuracy motivation and anchoring on metacomprehension judgment and accuracy.准确性动机和锚定对元理解判断及准确性的影响。
J Gen Psychol. 2012 Jul-Sep;139(3):155-74. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2012.680523.
7
Does aging affect the use of shifting standards?衰老会影响转换标准的使用吗?
Exp Aging Res. 2008 Jan-Mar;34(1):1-12. doi: 10.1080/03610730701525428.
8
The effect of accuracy motivation on anchoring and adjustment: do people adjust from provided anchors?准确性动机对锚定和调整的影响:人们会根据提供的锚点进行调整吗?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Dec;99(6):917-32. doi: 10.1037/a0021540.
9
Precision of the anchor influences the amount of adjustment.锚定的精度会影响调整量。
Psychol Sci. 2008 Feb;19(2):121-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02057.x.
10
Electrophysiological correlates of adjustment process in anchoring effects.锚定效应中调整过程的电生理关联
Neurosci Lett. 2008 Nov 21;445(3):199-203. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.07.061. Epub 2008 Jul 26.

引用本文的文献

1
The Measurement-Unit Bias: People Walk or Drive Less to Save a Constant Money Amount When Answering in Meters Compared to Miles.计量单位偏差:与英里相比,当以米为单位回答时,人们为节省固定金额的钱而步行或开车的距离会减少。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 14;15(3):369. doi: 10.3390/bs15030369.
2
The role of anchoring information in judgments of learning.锚定信息在学习判断中的作用。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Dec 24. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01670-0.
3
The power of past performance in multidimensional supplier evaluation and supplier selection: Debiasing anchoring bias and its knock-on effects.
多维供应商评估和供应商选择中过去绩效的作用:消除锚定偏差及其连锁效应。
PLoS One. 2024 May 16;19(5):e0303700. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303700. eCollection 2024.
4
Visual event boundaries restrict anchoring effects in decision-making.视觉事件边界限制决策中的锚定效应。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Oct 31;120(44):e2303883120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2303883120. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
5
Perceptual anchoring effects: Evidence of response bias and a change in estimates sensitivity.感知锚定效应:反应偏差和估计敏感性变化的证据。
Brain Behav. 2023 Nov;13(11):e3254. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3254. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
6
Hypocrisy in ethical consumption.道德消费中的虚伪现象。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 25;13:880009. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.880009. eCollection 2022.
7
What Stimuli Are Necessary for Anchoring Effects to Occur?锚定效应的产生需要哪些刺激因素?
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 12;12:602372. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.602372. eCollection 2021.
8
Evidence against subliminal anchoring: Two close, highly powered, preregistered, and failed replication attempts.反对阈下锚定效应的证据:两项严谨、功效强大、预先注册但复制尝试失败的研究。
J Exp Soc Psychol. 2021 Jan;92:104066. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104066. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
9
Individual Differences in Anchoring Effect: Evidence for the Role of Insufficient Adjustment.锚定效应中的个体差异:不充分调整作用的证据。
Eur J Psychol. 2019 Feb 28;15(1):8-24. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v15i1.1691. eCollection 2019 Feb.
10
The anchoring effect in metamemory monitoring.元记忆监测中的锚定效应。
Mem Cognit. 2018 Apr;46(3):384-397. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0772-6.