Suppr超能文献

注意的焦点能容纳多个、分离的项目吗?

Can the focus of attention accommodate multiple, separate items?

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Nov;37(6):1484-502. doi: 10.1037/a0024352. Epub 2011 Jul 18.

Abstract

Researchers of working memory currently debate capacity limits of the focus of attention, the proposed mental faculty in which items are most easily accessed. Cowan (1999) suggested that its capacity is about 4 chunks, whereas others have suggested that its capacity is only 1 chunk. Recently, Oberauer and Bialkova (2009) found evidence that 2 items could reside in the focus of attention, but only because they were combined into a single chunk. We modified their experimental procedure, which depends on a pattern of switch costs, to obtain a situation in which chunking was not likely to occur (i.e., each item remained a separate chunk) and still obtained results consistent with a capacity of at least 2 items. Therefore, either the focus of attention can hold multiple chunks or the switch cost logic must be reconsidered.

摘要

当前,工作记忆的研究人员对注意焦点的容量极限,即最容易被获取的项目所涉及的心理能力,存在争议。考恩(1999)认为其容量约为 4 个组块,而其他人则认为其容量仅为 1 个组块。最近,奥伯劳尔和比亚尔科娃(2009)发现证据表明,2 个项目可以驻留在注意焦点中,但这仅仅是因为它们被组合成了单个组块。我们修改了他们的实验程序,该程序依赖于转换代价模式,以获得一种不太可能发生组块的情况(即,每个项目仍然是一个单独的组块),并且仍然得到了与至少 2 个项目的容量一致的结果。因此,要么注意焦点可以容纳多个组块,要么必须重新考虑转换代价逻辑。

相似文献

1
Can the focus of attention accommodate multiple, separate items?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Nov;37(6):1484-502. doi: 10.1037/a0024352. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
3
Attention to attributes and objects in working memory.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 May;39(3):731-47. doi: 10.1037/a0029687. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
4
The bilateral field advantage effect in memory precision.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Mar;71(3):749-758. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1276943. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
5
Spatial transposition gradients in visual working memory.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(1):3-15. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.789543. Epub 2013 May 10.
6
Models of verbal working memory capacity: what does it take to make them work?
Psychol Rev. 2012 Jul;119(3):480-99. doi: 10.1037/a0027791. Epub 2012 Apr 9.
7
Dimension-based working memory-driven capture of visual selection.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Jun;62(6):1123-31. doi: 10.1080/17470210802624353. Epub 2009 Jan 10.
9
Interference between maintenance and processing in working memory: the effect of item-distractor similarity in complex span.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 May;38(3):665-85. doi: 10.1037/a0026337. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
10
Chunking during serial learning by a pigeon: III. What are the necessary conditions for establishing a chunk?
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1991 Jan;17(1):107-18. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.17.1.107.

引用本文的文献

1
Constraints on multi-item working memory access: performance costs and retrieval dynamics.
Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 9;16:1558689. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1558689. eCollection 2025.
2
The multicomponent model of working memory fifty years on.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 Feb;78(2):222-239. doi: 10.1177/17470218241290909. Epub 2024 Nov 8.
3
The Relation Between Attention and Memory.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2024 Jan 18;75:183-214. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-040723-012736. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
4
The association of targets modulates the search efficiency in multitarget searches.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Aug;85(6):1888-1904. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02771-9. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
5
Allocation of resources in working memory: Theoretical and empirical implications for visual search.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Aug;28(4):1093-1111. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01881-5. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
6
Prioritization within visual working memory reflects a flexible focus of attention.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Aug;82(6):2985-3004. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02049-4.
8
Working Memory and Attention - A Conceptual Analysis and Review.
J Cogn. 2019 Aug 8;2(1):36. doi: 10.5334/joc.58.
9
Short-term memory based on activated long-term memory: A review in response to Norris (2017).
Psychol Bull. 2019 Aug;145(8):822-847. doi: 10.1037/bul0000199.
10
What do people typically do between list items? The nature of attention-based mnemonic activities depends on task context.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 May;45(5):779-794. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000625. Epub 2018 Jul 19.

本文引用的文献

1
On the law relating processing to storage in working memory.
Psychol Rev. 2011 Apr;118(2):175-92. doi: 10.1037/a0022324.
2
Serial and parallel processes in working memory after practice.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Apr;37(2):606-14. doi: 10.1037/a0020986.
3
The focus of attention as observed in visual working memory tasks: making sense of competing claims.
Neuropsychologia. 2011 May;49(6):1401-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.01.035. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
4
Flexible attention allocation to visual and auditory working memory tasks: manipulating reward induces a trade-off.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Feb;73(2):458-72. doi: 10.3758/s13414-010-0031-4.
5
A neural region of abstract working memory.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Oct;23(10):2852-63. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2011.21625. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
6
Topographic maps of multisensory attention.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Nov 16;107(46):20110-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011616107. Epub 2010 Nov 1.
7
Dissociable contributions of prefrontal cortex and the hippocampus to short-term memory: evidence for a 3-state model of memory.
Neuroimage. 2011 Jan 15;54(2):1540-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.002. Epub 2010 Sep 9.
8
Loss of visual working memory within seconds: the combined use of refreshable and non-refreshable features.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Nov;36(6):1355-68. doi: 10.1037/a0020356.
10
Seven-year-olds allocate attention like adults unless working memory is overloaded.
Dev Sci. 2010 Jan 1;13(1):120-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00864.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验