Department of Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences, Brown University, Box 1978, Providence, RI 02912, USA.
Psychol Sci. 2010 Aug;21(8):1123-33. doi: 10.1177/0956797610376651. Epub 2010 Jul 12.
Neural activation in a 12-item probe-recognition task was examined to investigate the contribution of the hippocampus to long-term memory (LTM) retrieval and working memory (WM) retrieval. Results indicated a dissociation between the last item that participants studied and other items of the study list: Compared with all other serial positions, activation was reduced for the item in the most recent position (for which no items intervened between study and test). This finding suggests that this last item was in focal attention at test time, and, therefore, no retrieval operation was required to access it. However, contra the assertion that the hippocampus should selectively support LTM, activation of the medial temporal lobe was observed for all serial positions other than the last position, and activation level could be predicted from the underlying memory strength. Collectively, these findings support single-store accounts that assume there are similar operating principles across WM and LTM representations, and the focus of attention is limited.
采用 12 项探测识别任务来检测神经激活,以研究海马体对长期记忆(LTM)检索和工作记忆(WM)检索的贡献。结果表明,参与者学习的最后一项与学习列表中的其他项目之间存在分离:与所有其他连续位置相比,最近位置的激活减少(在学习和测试之间没有其他项目介入)。这一发现表明,该最后一项在测试时处于焦点注意力,因此,不需要检索操作来访问它。然而,与海马体应该选择性地支持 LTM 的说法相反,除了最后一个位置之外,所有连续位置都观察到内侧颞叶的激活,并且激活水平可以从基础记忆强度中预测。总的来说,这些发现支持单一存储账户的观点,该观点假设 WM 和 LTM 表示之间存在类似的操作原则,并且注意力集中有限。