Laboratory of Epidemiology, Demography, and Biometry, National Institute on Aging, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Aug;41(2):136-45. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.03.019.
Physical inactivity is a risk factor for obesity, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and other chronic diseases that are increasingly prevalent in the U.S. and worldwide. Time at work represents a major portion of the day for employed people.
To determine how employment status (full-time, part-time, or not employed) and job type (active or sedentary) are related to daily physical activity levels in American adults.
Cross-sectional data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) were collected in 2003-2004 and analyzed in 2010. Physical activity was measured using Actigraph uniaxial accelerometers, and participants aged 20-60 years with ≥4 days of monitoring were included (N=1826). Accelerometer variables included mean counts/minute during wear time and proportion of wear time spent in various intensity levels.
In men, full-time workers were more active than healthy nonworkers (p=0.004), and in weekday-only analyses, even workers with sedentary jobs were more active (p=0.03) and spent less time sedentary (p<0.001) than nonworkers. In contrast with men, women with full-time sedentary jobs spent more time sedentary (p=0.008) and had less light and lifestyle intensity activity than healthy nonworkers on weekdays. Within full-time workers, those with active jobs had greater weekday activity than those with sedentary jobs (22% greater in men, 30% greater in women).
In men, full-time employment, even in sedentary occupations, is positively associated with physical activity compared to not working, and in both genders job type has a major bearing on daily activity levels.
身体活动不足是肥胖、心血管疾病、高血压和其他慢性病的一个风险因素,这些疾病在美国和全球范围内日益普遍。对于上班族来说,工作时间占据了一天中的大部分时间。
确定就业状态(全职、兼职或未就业)和工作类型(体力活动或久坐)与美国成年人的日常体力活动水平有何关系。
使用单轴加速度计 Actigraph 对 2003-2004 年全国健康和营养调查(NHANES)收集的横断面数据进行分析,并于 2010 年进行分析。体力活动通过 Actigraph 单轴加速计进行测量,参与者年龄在 20-60 岁之间,且至少有 4 天的监测记录(N=1826)。加速度计变量包括佩戴时间内的平均计数/分钟和不同强度水平下佩戴时间的比例。
在男性中,全职工作者比健康非工作者更活跃(p=0.004),仅在工作日分析中,即使是从事久坐工作的工作者也更活跃(p=0.03),且久坐时间更少(p<0.001)而非工作者。与男性相比,全职久坐工作的女性在工作日花更多的时间久坐(p=0.008),且轻体力活动和生活方式强度活动也少于健康非工作者。在全职工作者中,从事体力活动工作的人比从事久坐工作的人在工作日有更多的活动(男性多 22%,女性多 30%)。
在男性中,与不工作相比,全职工作,即使是从事久坐职业,也与体力活动呈正相关,而且在男女两性中,工作类型对日常活动水平有重大影响。