Yasuda Tomohiro, Ogasawara Riki, Sakamaki Mikako, Bemben Michael G, Abe Takashi
Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2011 Sep;31(5):347-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-097X.2011.01022.x. Epub 2011 Mar 22.
We examined the relationship between training-induced limb and trunk muscle hypertrophy in high-intensity resistance training (HIT) or blood flow-restricted low-intensity resistance training (LI-BFR) programmes. Thirty young men were divided into three groups: HIT (n = 10), LI-BFR (n = 10) and non-training control (CON, n = 10). The HIT and LI-BFR groups performed 75% and 30%, respectively, of one-repetition maximal (1-RM) bench press exercise, 3 days per week for 6 weeks. During the training sessions, the LI-BFR group wore elastic cuffs around the most proximal region of both arms. Muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) and 1-RM bench press strength were measured before and 3 days after the final training session. Total training volumes (lifting weight × number of repetitions) for all of the sessions were similar between the two training groups. The training led to a significant increase (P < 0·05) in bench press 1-RM in the two training groups, but not in the CON group. Triceps brachii and pectoralis major muscle CSA increased 8·8% and 15·8% (P < 0·01), respectively, in the HIT group and 4·9% (P < 0·05) and 8·3% (P < 0·01), respectively, in the LI-BFR group, but not in the CON group (-1·1% and 0·0%, respectively). There was significant correlation (r = 0·70, P < 0·05) between increases in triceps brachii and pectoralis major muscle CSA in the HIT group; however, the correlation was lower and non-significant in the LI-BFR group (r = 0·54). Our results suggest that limb and trunk muscle hypertrophy occurs simultaneously during HIT but not during LI-BFR, possibly owing to individual differences in activation of the arm and chest muscles during the training sessions.
我们研究了高强度抗阻训练(HIT)或血流限制低强度抗阻训练(LI-BFR)方案中训练诱导的肢体和躯干肌肉肥大之间的关系。30名年轻男性被分为三组:HIT组(n = 10)、LI-BFR组(n = 10)和非训练对照组(CON组,n = 10)。HIT组和LI-BFR组分别进行1次最大重复量(1-RM)卧推练习的75%和30%,每周3天,共6周。在训练期间,LI-BFR组在双臂最近端区域佩戴弹性袖带。在最后一次训练前和训练后3天测量肌肉横截面积(CSA)和1-RM卧推力量。两个训练组所有训练课的总训练量(举起重量×重复次数)相似。训练导致两个训练组的卧推1-RM显著增加(P < 0.05),但CON组没有增加。HIT组肱三头肌和胸大肌CSA分别增加8.8%和15.8%(P < 0.01),LI-BFR组分别增加4.9%(P < 0.05)和8.3%(P < 0.01),但CON组没有增加(分别为-1.1%和0.0%)。HIT组肱三头肌和胸大肌CSA增加之间存在显著相关性(r = 0.70,P < 0.05);然而,LI-BFR组的相关性较低且不显著(r = 0.54)。我们的结果表明,HIT期间肢体和躯干肌肉肥大同时发生,但LI-BFR期间并非如此,这可能是由于训练期间手臂和胸部肌肉激活的个体差异所致。