CNRU, Department of Psychology and Communication, Aalborg University Aalborg, Denmark.
Front Physiol. 2011;2:79. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00079. Epub 2011 Apr 27.
The brain may undergo functional reorganizations. Selective loss of sensory input or training within a restricted part of a modality cause "shifts" within for instance somatotopic or tonotopic maps. Cross-modal plasticity occurs when input within a modality is absent - e.g., in the congenitally blind. Reorganizations are also found in functional recovery after brain injury. Focusing on such reorganizations, it may be studied whether a cognitive or conscious process can exclusively be mediated by one neural substrate - or may be associated with multiple neural representations. This is typically known as the problem of multiple realization - an essentially empirical issue with wide theoretical implications. This issue may appear to have a simple solution. When, for instance, the symptoms associated with brain injury disappear and the recovery is associated with increased activities within spared regions of the brain, it is tempting to conclude that the processes originally associated with the injured part of the brain are now mediated by an alternative neural substrate. Such a conclusion is, however, not a simple matter. Without a more thorough analysis, it cannot be concluded that a functional recovery of for instance language or attention is necessarily associated with a novel representation of the processes lost to injury. Alternatively, for instance, the recovery may reflect that apparently similar surface phenomena are obtained via dissimilar cognitive mechanisms. In this paper we propose a theoretical framework, which we believe can guide the design and interpretations of studies of post-traumatic recovery. It is essential to distinguish between a number of levels of analysis - including a differentiation between the surface phenomena and the underlying information processing - when addressing, for instance, whether a pre-traumatic and post-traumatically recovered cognitive or conscious process are actually the same. We propose a (somewhat preliminary) system of levels of analysis, which can be applied to such studies.
大脑可能会经历功能重组。在感觉输入受限的情况下,或者在某一感觉模态的特定部分进行训练,会导致例如躯体感觉或音调感觉图的“转移”。当一种模态的输入缺失时,会出现跨模态可塑性——例如,在先天性失明的情况下。在脑损伤后的功能恢复中也会发现重组。关注这些重组,可以研究认知或意识过程是否可以仅由一个神经基质介导——或者可能与多个神经表示相关联。这通常被称为多重实现问题——这是一个具有广泛理论意义的本质上是经验性的问题。这个问题似乎有一个简单的解决方案。例如,当与脑损伤相关的症状消失,而恢复与大脑未受损区域的活动增加相关时,人们很容易得出结论,与大脑受损部分最初相关的过程现在由替代的神经基质介导。然而,这样的结论并不是一件简单的事情。没有更彻底的分析,就不能得出这样的结论:例如,语言或注意力的功能恢复必然与受伤过程的新表示相关联。或者,例如,恢复可能反映出,表面上相似的现象是通过不同的认知机制获得的。在本文中,我们提出了一个理论框架,我们相信这个框架可以指导创伤后恢复研究的设计和解释。在解决例如,创伤前和创伤后恢复的认知或意识过程是否实际上是相同的问题时,必须区分分析的几个层次——包括区分表面现象和潜在的信息处理。我们提出了一个(有点初步的)分析层次系统,可以将其应用于此类研究。