• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

呼吁建立更具流行病学和以患者为导向的药物警戒。

A plea for a more epidemiological and patient-oriented pharmacovigilance.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Epidemiology, Centro Studi SIFO, Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, Via Nazionale 8/a, 66030, S. Maria Imbaro, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Jan;68(1):11-9. doi: 10.1007/s00228-011-1096-2. Epub 2011 Jul 20.

DOI:10.1007/s00228-011-1096-2
PMID:21773732
Abstract

The present work has the main objective of summarizing the history of pharmacovigilance and the associated methods and legislation and of showing how it could/should be reformulated in terms of a transition from a drug-centered to a patient/population-centered approach. The recurrent emergencies associated with new drug molecules raise many questions about the efficacy and efficiency of methodological tools as well as the role of regulatory systems. Drugs cannot be considered as an independent variable: the evaluation of all their effects must take into account the real contexts in which they are used and which affect not only their efficacy but also their tolerability and safety. Specific emphasis is given to recent and promising developments focused on the participation of patients and populations as key actors in producing knowledge that could technically integrate what has been produced so far and allow the evolution of surveillance from a role of controlling severe adverse reactions attributable to individual molecules to one of promoting a comprehensive assessment of the benefit/risk profile of drugs as they are utilized in society.

摘要

本研究的主要目的是总结药物警戒学的历史以及相关的方法和法规,并展示如何从以药物为中心的方法向以患者/人群为中心的方法进行转变。与新药物分子相关的反复出现的紧急情况引发了许多关于方法学工具的有效性和效率以及监管系统作用的问题。药物不能被视为一个独立的变量:对其所有作用的评估必须考虑到它们实际使用的环境,这些环境不仅会影响其疗效,还会影响其耐受性和安全性。特别强调了最近和有前途的发展,这些发展侧重于让患者和人群作为产生知识的关键角色参与其中,这些知识可以在技术上整合迄今为止所产生的知识,并允许监测从控制归因于单个分子的严重不良反应的角色演变为促进对药物的获益/风险特征进行全面评估,因为它们在社会中得到了应用。

相似文献

1
A plea for a more epidemiological and patient-oriented pharmacovigilance.呼吁建立更具流行病学和以患者为导向的药物警戒。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Jan;68(1):11-9. doi: 10.1007/s00228-011-1096-2. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
2
The history of pharmacovigilance.药物警戒的历史。
Therapie. 2016 Apr;71(2):129-34. doi: 10.1016/j.therap.2015.12.007. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
3
An historical overview over Pharmacovigilance.药物警戒的历史概述。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 Aug;40(4):744-747. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0657-1. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
4
[Direct reporting by patients of adverse drug reactions in Spain].[西班牙患者对药物不良反应的直接报告]
Farm Hosp. 2013 Jan-Feb;37(1):65-71. doi: 10.7399/FH.2013.37.1.121.
5
Strengthening and rationalizing pharmacovigilance in the EU: where is Europe heading to? A review of the new EU legislation on pharmacovigilance.加强和合理化欧盟的药物警戒:欧洲将走向何方?对新的欧盟药物警戒立法的审查。
Drug Saf. 2011 Mar 1;34(3):187-97. doi: 10.2165/11586620-000000000-00000.
6
The role and strategy of ISoP in global pharmacovigilance.国际药物警戒科学合作组织(ISoP)在全球药物警戒中的作用与策略。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 Aug;40(4):740-743. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0708-7. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
7
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance department in the pharmaceutical industry: results of an Italian national survey.制药行业药物警戒部门的发展:一项意大利全国性调查的结果
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2024 Nov 4;15:20420986241293296. doi: 10.1177/20420986241293296. eCollection 2024.
8
[The new pharmacovigilance legislation in practice].[新药物警戒法规的实际应用]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2014;158:A7129.
9
Investigating the Benefit-Risk Profile of Drugs: From Spontaneous Reporting Systems to Real-World Data for Pharmacovigilance.研究药物的获益-风险概况:从自发报告系统到用于药物警戒的真实世界数据。
Methods Mol Biol. 2025;2834:333-349. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4003-6_16.
10
Pharmacovigilance Programme of India: Recent developments and future perspectives.印度药物警戒计划:近期进展与未来展望
Indian J Pharmacol. 2016 Nov-Dec;48(6):624-628. doi: 10.4103/0253-7613.194855.

引用本文的文献

1
Jordanians' knowledge, attitude and practice regarding adverse drug reactions reporting.约旦人在药品不良反应报告方面的知识、态度和做法。
Saudi Pharm J. 2023 Jul;31(7):1197-1201. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2023.05.016. Epub 2023 May 18.
2
The Perception of Primary School Teachers Regarding the Pharmacotherapy of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.小学生教师对注意缺陷多动障碍药物治疗的看法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 9;18(12):6233. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126233.
3
Discrepancy between patient- and healthcare provider-reported adverse drug reactions in inflammatory bowel disease patients on biological therapy.

本文引用的文献

1
Power and dependence; social audit on the safety of medicines.权力与依赖;药品安全的社会审计
Int J Risk Saf Med. 1992;3(5):337. doi: 10.3233/JRS-1992-35-614.
2
A patient's perspective: the impact of adverse drug reactions on patients and their views on reporting.患者视角:药物不良反应对患者的影响及其对报告的看法。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2012 Apr;37(2):148-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2011.01258.x. Epub 2011 May 18.
3
Quality of care in frail older people: the fragile balance between receiving and giving.体弱老年人的护理质量:接受与给予之间的脆弱平衡。
生物治疗炎症性肠病患者中患者和医疗保健提供者报告的不良反应之间的差异。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2021 Oct;9(8):919-928. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12107. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
4
Public Awareness about Medicine Information, Safety, and Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) Reporting in Dammam, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯达曼地区公众对药品信息、安全性及药品不良反应(ADR)报告的认知情况。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2020 Nov 18;8(4):222. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy8040222.
5
Intensive Monitoring Studies for Assessing Medicines: A Systematic Review.用于评估药物的强化监测研究:一项系统评价
Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Jul 19;6:147. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00147. eCollection 2019.
6
Spontaneous Reporting on Adverse Events by Consumers in the United States: An Analysis of the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System Database.美国消费者对不良事件的自发报告:对食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统数据库的分析
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2018 Jun;5(2):117-128. doi: 10.1007/s40801-018-0134-0.
7
Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude and Barriers towards Pharmacovigilance among Physicians and Pharmacists of Abbottabad, Pakistan.巴基斯坦阿伯塔巴德医生和药剂师对药物警戒的知识、态度及障碍评估
Pharmacy (Basel). 2018 Mar 31;6(2):29. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy6020029.
8
Adverse drug reactions (ADRS) reporting: awareness and reasons of under-reporting among health care professionals, a challenge for pharmacists.药品不良反应(ADR)报告:医护人员对报告的认知及报告不足的原因,这对药剂师而言是一项挑战。
Springerplus. 2016 Oct 12;5(1):1778. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3337-4. eCollection 2016.
9
The value of patient reporting to the pharmacovigilance system: a systematic review.患者向药物警戒系统报告的价值:一项系统评价
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Feb;83(2):227-246. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13098. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
10
Pediatric drug safety signal detection: a new drug-event reference set for performance testing of data-mining methods and systems.儿科药物安全信号检测:用于数据挖掘方法和系统性能测试的新药-事件参考集。
Drug Saf. 2015 Feb;38(2):207-17. doi: 10.1007/s40264-015-0265-0.
BMJ. 2011 Mar 25;342:d403. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d403.
4
Patient views and experiences of making adverse drug reaction reports to the Yellow Card Scheme in the UK.患者对在英国向黄卡计划报告药物不良反应的看法和体验。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 May;20(5):523-31. doi: 10.1002/pds.2117. Epub 2011 Feb 17.
5
Action on the social determinants of health and health inequities goes global.全球行动起来,解决影响健康的社会决定因素和健康不平等问题。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2011;32:225-36. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031210-101220.
6
Frailty and chronic diseases in older adults.老年人的虚弱和慢性病。
Clin Geriatr Med. 2011 Feb;27(1):39-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2010.08.003.
7
New rules will allow EU patients to report drug concerns directly.新规定将允许欧盟患者直接举报药物相关问题。
BMJ. 2010 Sep 28;341:c5344. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c5344.
8
Are the millennium development goals on target?千年发展目标是否有望实现?
BMJ. 2010 Sep 14;341:c5045. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c5045.
9
Risk Management Plans: are they a tool for improving drug safety?风险管理计划:它们是提高药物安全性的工具吗?
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Aug;66(8):785-90. doi: 10.1007/s00228-010-0848-8. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
10
Improving pharmacovigilance in Europe.提高欧洲的药物警戒水平。
BMJ. 2010 Apr 12;340:c1694. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1694.