Food Research Division, Bureau of Chemical Safety, Food Directorate, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2012 Jan;402(1):139-62. doi: 10.1007/s00216-011-5237-3. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
This article covers challenges and trends in the determination of some major food chemical contaminants and allergens, which-among others-are being monitored by Health Canada's Food Directorate and for which background levels in food and human exposure are being analyzed and calculated. Eleven different contaminants/contaminant groups and allergens have been selected for detailed discussion in this paper. They occur in foods as a result of: use as a food additive or ingredient; processing-induced reactions; food packaging migration; deliberate adulteration; and/or presence as a chemical contaminant or natural toxin in the environment. Examples include acrylamide as a food-processing-induced contaminant, bisphenol A as a food packaging-derived chemical, melamine and related compounds as food adulterants and persistent organic pollutants, and perchlorate as an environmental contaminant. Ochratoxin A, fumonisins, and paralytic shellfish poisoning toxins are examples of naturally occurring toxins whereas sulfites, peanuts, and milk exemplify common allergenic food additives/ingredients. To deal with the increasing number of sample matrices and analytes of interest, two analytical approaches have become increasingly prevalent. The first has been the development of rapid screening methods for a variety of analytes based on immunochemical techniques, utilizing ELISA or surface plasmon resonance technology. The second is the development of highly sophisticated multi-analyte methods based on liquid chromatography coupled with multiple-stage mass spectrometry for identification and simultaneous quantification of a wide range of contaminants, often with much less requirement for tedious cleanup procedures. Whereas rapid screening methods enable testing of large numbers of samples, the multi analyte mass spectrometric methods enable full quantification with confirmation of the analytes of interest. Both approaches are useful when gathering surveillance data to determine occurrence and background levels of both recognized and newly identified contaminants in foods in order to estimate human daily intake for health risk assessment.
本文涵盖了一些主要食品化学污染物和过敏原测定方面的挑战和趋势,其中一些污染物和过敏原正在被加拿大卫生部食品局进行监测,并且正在对其在食品中的本底水平和人体暴露情况进行分析和计算。本文详细讨论了 11 种不同的污染物/污染物组和过敏原。它们在食品中出现的原因有:作为食品添加剂或成分使用;加工诱导的反应;食品包装迁移;故意掺假;以及/或者作为环境中的化学污染物或天然毒素存在。例如丙烯酰胺是一种食品加工过程中产生的污染物,双酚 A 是一种来自食品包装的化学物质,三聚氰胺和相关化合物是食品掺假物和持久性有机污染物,高氯酸盐是一种环境污染物。赭曲霉毒素 A、伏马菌素和麻痹性贝类毒素是天然毒素的例子,而亚硫酸盐、花生和牛奶则是常见的致敏性食品添加剂/成分的例子。为了应对越来越多的感兴趣的样品基质和分析物,两种分析方法变得越来越流行。第一种方法是基于免疫化学技术,利用 ELISA 或表面等离子体共振技术,开发各种分析物的快速筛选方法。第二种方法是开发基于液相色谱与多级质谱联用的高度复杂的多分析物方法,用于识别和同时定量广泛的污染物,通常需要繁琐的清理程序。快速筛选方法能够测试大量的样品,而多分析物质谱方法能够对感兴趣的分析物进行全定量和确证。当收集监测数据以确定食品中已识别和新识别的污染物的发生和背景水平,以便估计人类每日摄入量进行健康风险评估时,这两种方法都很有用。