University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Hum Genet. 2011 Sep;130(3):433-40. doi: 10.1007/s00439-011-1065-y. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
This paper surveys the current state of knowledge about the relationship between different national publics and biobanks, how different publics perceive biobanks, and which issues are identified as important by various stakeholders. We discuss existing studies and emerging governance strategies dealing with the biobank-publics interface and argue that the search for phantom (biobank) public(s) is on, but still much needs to be done. We argue that the existing data originate in a relatively few regions, among them Northern Europe, the United Kingdom, and in certain U.S. states and are often based on survey research with small samples and short questionnaires. Combined usage of qualitative and quantitative methodology in studies is still rare though of great importance in order to investigate distributions of public opinion and also to be able to explain these patterns. Many important questions in the relationship between publics and biobanks are unexplored, or the existing data are inconsistent.
本文调查了不同国家公众与生物库之间关系的现有知识状况、不同公众对生物库的看法,以及各利益相关者认为哪些问题重要。我们讨论了现有的研究和新兴的生物库-公众界面治理策略,并认为对(生物库)公众的幻影的追寻仍在继续,但仍有许多工作要做。我们认为,现有数据主要来自相对较少的地区,其中包括北欧、英国以及美国的某些州,并且通常基于小样本和简短问卷的调查研究。尽管在调查民意分布以及解释这些模式方面非常重要,但在研究中结合使用定性和定量方法仍然很少。生物库与公众之间关系的许多重要问题尚未得到探讨,或者现有的数据不一致。