• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

住宅庭院的保护价值:联系鸟类和人类。

The conservation value of residential yards: linking birds and people.

机构信息

Graduate Program in Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, USA.

出版信息

Ecol Appl. 2011 Jun;21(4):1327-39. doi: 10.1890/10-0423.1.

DOI:10.1890/10-0423.1
PMID:21774433
Abstract

Urbanization is recognized as one of the greatest threats to biodiversity throughout the world. However, the vegetation within an urbanized landscape is diverse and includes a variety of native and exotic plant species. This variation allows for testing whether certain landscape designs outperform others in the support of native biodiversity. Residential yards represent a large component of an urban landscape and, if managed collectively for birds and other wildlife, could offset some of the negative effects of urbanization. In addition, many urbanites have their primary interaction with the natural world in their front and back yards. Therefore, ensuring positive wildlife experiences for them is essential in promoting urban biodiversity. At the Central Arizona-Phoenix Long-Term Ecological Research site we tested the efficacy of native landscaping in residential yards in attracting native birds. We also explored the links between socioeconomic factors, landscape designs, and urban gradient measurements with the urban bird communities. A redundancy analysis suggested that native desert bird species increased in abundance in neighborhoods with desert landscaping designs, neighborhoods closer to large desert tracts, and higher-income neighborhoods. Variance partitioning showed that collectively these three sets of environmental variables explained almost 50% of the variation in the urban bird community. Results suggested racial and economic inequities in access to biodiversity, whereby predominantly Hispanic and lower-income neighborhoods had fewer native birds. We also found that residents' satisfaction with bird diversity was positively correlated with actual bird diversity. Our study provides new insights into the relative importance of socioeconomic variables and common urban ecological measurements in explaining urban bird communities. Urban planners can use this information to develop residential landscapes that support the well-being of both birds and people.

摘要

城市化被认为是全球范围内对生物多样性的最大威胁之一。然而,城市景观中的植被是多样的,包括各种本地和外来植物物种。这种变化使得我们可以测试某些景观设计在支持本地生物多样性方面是否优于其他设计。住宅庭院是城市景观的重要组成部分,如果为鸟类和其他野生动物进行集体管理,可以抵消城市化的一些负面影响。此外,许多城市居民与自然世界的主要互动是在前院和后院。因此,确保他们获得积极的野生动物体验对于促进城市生物多样性至关重要。在亚利桑那州中部-凤凰城长期生态研究站,我们测试了住宅庭院中本地景观设计对吸引本地鸟类的效果。我们还探讨了社会经济因素、景观设计以及与城市梯度测量相关的因素与城市鸟类群落之间的联系。冗余分析表明,在具有沙漠景观设计的社区、靠近大型沙漠地带的社区以及高收入社区中,本地沙漠鸟类物种的数量增加。方差分解表明,这三组环境变量共同解释了城市鸟类群落变异的近 50%。结果表明,在获得生物多样性方面存在种族和经济不平等,主要是西班牙裔和低收入社区的本地鸟类较少。我们还发现,居民对鸟类多样性的满意度与实际鸟类多样性呈正相关。我们的研究提供了关于社会经济变量和常见城市生态测量在解释城市鸟类群落方面的相对重要性的新见解。城市规划者可以利用这些信息来开发支持鸟类和人类福祉的住宅景观。

相似文献

1
The conservation value of residential yards: linking birds and people.住宅庭院的保护价值:联系鸟类和人类。
Ecol Appl. 2011 Jun;21(4):1327-39. doi: 10.1890/10-0423.1.
2
Having our yards and sharing them too: the collective effects of yards on native bird species in an urban landscape.拥有和分享我们的院子:城市景观中院子对本地鸟类物种的集体影响。
Ecol Appl. 2014;24(8):2132-43. doi: 10.1890/13-2259.1.
3
Residential yard management and landscape cover affect urban bird community diversity across the continental USA.住宅庭院管理和景观覆盖对美国大陆城市鸟类群落多样性的影响。
Ecol Appl. 2021 Dec;31(8):e02455. doi: 10.1002/eap.2455. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
4
Linking foraging decisions to residential yard bird composition.将觅食决策与住宅庭院鸟类组成联系起来。
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43497. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043497. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
5
Street trees reduce the negative effects of urbanization on birds.行道树减轻城市化对鸟类的负面影响。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 23;12(3):e0174484. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174484. eCollection 2017.
6
Species traits explain public perceptions of human-bird interactions.物种特征解释了公众对人类与鸟类互动的认知。
Ecol Appl. 2022 Dec;32(8):e2676. doi: 10.1002/eap.2676. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
7
Opposite Responses of Native and Nonnative Birds to Socioeconomics in a Latin American City.拉丁美洲一座城市中本地鸟类和非本地鸟类对社会经济状况的相反反应。
Animals (Basel). 2024 Jan 18;14(2):299. doi: 10.3390/ani14020299.
8
Urban noise and surrounding city morphology influence green space occupancy by native birds in a Mediterranean-type South American metropolis.城市噪音和周边城市形态影响着南美地中海型大都市中本地鸟类对绿地的占有率。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 16;12(1):4471. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08654-7.
9
A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers.一项关于城市化对鸟类和植物多样性影响的全球分析揭示了关键的人为驱动因素。
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Feb 12;281(1780):20133330. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.3330. Print 2014 Apr 7.
10
Detecting the response of bird communities and biodiversity to habitat loss and fragmentation due to urbanization.检测由于城市化导致的鸟类群落和生物多样性对生境丧失和破碎化的响应。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 May 15;624:1561-1576. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.143. Epub 2017 Dec 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Urban coyote spatiotemporal overlap with humans is associated with environmental characteristics not human sociodemographics.城市郊狼与人类的时空重叠与环境特征有关,而非人类社会人口统计学因素。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 27;15(1):31597. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-16323-8.
2
The Impact of Vegetation Structure on Shaping Urban Avian Communities in Chaoyang District Beijing, China.植被结构对中国北京朝阳区城市鸟类群落形成的影响
Animals (Basel). 2025 Jul 28;15(15):2214. doi: 10.3390/ani15152214.
3
Using unstructured crowd-sourced data to evaluate urban tolerance of terrestrial native animal species within a California Mega-City.
利用非结构化的众包数据评估加利福尼亚大城市中陆地本地动物物种的城市耐受能力。
PLoS One. 2024 May 29;19(5):e0295476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295476. eCollection 2024.
4
Supplementary feeding of birds during the winter influences measures of avian community structure in yards in a subtropical city.冬季给鸟类补饲会影响亚热带城市庭院中鸟类群落结构的衡量指标。
PLoS One. 2024 May 22;19(5):e0302007. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302007. eCollection 2024.
5
Patterns in bird and pollinator occupancy and richness in a mosaic of urban office parks across scales and seasons.跨尺度和季节的城市办公园区镶嵌景观中鸟类和传粉者的占据模式与丰富度
Ecol Evol. 2024 Mar 1;14(3):e10958. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10958. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
Opposite Responses of Native and Nonnative Birds to Socioeconomics in a Latin American City.拉丁美洲一座城市中本地鸟类和非本地鸟类对社会经济状况的相反反应。
Animals (Basel). 2024 Jan 18;14(2):299. doi: 10.3390/ani14020299.
7
Inequalities in noise will affect urban wildlife.噪音不平等会影响城市野生动物。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2024 Jan;8(1):163-174. doi: 10.1038/s41559-023-02257-9. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
8
Abundance of Non-Native Birds in the City: Spatial Variation and Relationship with Socioeconomics in a South American City.城市中非本土鸟类的数量:南美一座城市的空间变化及其与社会经济的关系
Animals (Basel). 2023 May 24;13(11):1737. doi: 10.3390/ani13111737.
9
No fry zones: How restaurant distribution and abundance influence avian communities in the Phoenix, AZ metropolitan area.无油炸区:餐厅分布和数量如何影响亚利桑那州凤凰城大都市区的鸟类群落。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 19;17(10):e0269334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269334. eCollection 2022.
10
Socio-eco-evolutionary dynamics in cities.城市中的社会生态进化动态
Evol Appl. 2020 Aug 19;14(1):248-267. doi: 10.1111/eva.13065. eCollection 2021 Jan.