Partners Harvard Medical International, Boston, MA 02116, USA.
Med Teach. 2011;33(8):608-13. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.590389.
Healthcare is becoming increasingly complex across the globe; technology, delivery models, economic requirements, demographics and the epidemiology of disease are changing at a rapid pace. Despite the multiple efforts in defining common competencies and standards that all healthcare professionals should meet, it has become clear that educational and training programs have to adjust to the needs of societies they serve, and that the institutions that design and deliver those programs need to be accountable to society for the products they produce. Academic institutions that educate healthcare professionals will have to interact differently with the many stakeholders needed to create effective and efficient, and culturally appropriate healthcare systems. Present day medical education has its roots in the European university which traditionally valued academic freedom, autonomy and independent research over serving society and the job market; future efforts will require a fundamental shift in the outlook and measures of success for academic institutions. The recent outcomes and competency movement is a first step in that direction but more will need to be done. Rather than being one participant, possibly a reluctant one, academia should become the catalyst for change, the hub for stakeholder interactions, and the breeding ground for the new healthcare workforce.
全球范围内,医疗保健服务变得日益复杂;技术、服务模式、经济需求、人口结构以及疾病流行趋势都在迅速变化。尽管人们已经付出了诸多努力来定义所有医疗保健专业人员都应达到的共同能力和标准,但很明显,教育和培训计划必须适应其服务的社会的需求,而且设计和提供这些计划的机构必须对其培养的人才对社会负责。培养医疗保健专业人员的学术机构将不得不与创建高效、有效和文化适宜的医疗保健系统所需的众多利益相关者进行不同的互动。当今的医学教育起源于传统上重视学术自由、自主权和独立研究而不是为社会和就业市场服务的欧洲大学;未来的努力将需要从根本上改变学术机构的前景和成功衡量标准。最近的成果和能力运动是朝着这个方向迈出的第一步,但还需要做更多的工作。学术界不应仅仅作为一个参与者(可能是不情愿的参与者),而应成为变革的催化剂、利益相关者互动的中心以及新医疗保健劳动力的培育地。