Medical Center Boulevard, Section on Nephrology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157-1053, USA.
Kidney Int. 2011 Nov;80(10):1080-91. doi: 10.1038/ki.2011.213. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
Prior small studies have shown multiple benefits of frequent nocturnal hemodialysis compared to conventional three times per week treatments. To study this further, we randomized 87 patients to three times per week conventional hemodialysis or to nocturnal hemodialysis six times per week, all with single-use high-flux dialyzers. The 45 patients in the frequent nocturnal arm had a 1.82-fold higher mean weekly stdKt/V(urea), a 1.74-fold higher average number of treatments per week, and a 2.45-fold higher average weekly treatment time than the 42 patients in the conventional arm. We did not find a significant effect of nocturnal hemodialysis for either of the two coprimary outcomes (death or left ventricular mass (measured by MRI) with a hazard ratio of 0.68, or of death or RAND Physical Health Composite with a hazard ratio of 0.91). Possible explanations for the left ventricular mass result include limited sample size and patient characteristics. Secondary outcomes included cognitive performance, self-reported depression, laboratory markers of nutrition, mineral metabolism and anemia, blood pressure and rates of hospitalization, and vascular access interventions. Patients in the nocturnal arm had improved control of hyperphosphatemia and hypertension, but no significant benefit among the other main secondary outcomes. There was a trend for increased vascular access events in the nocturnal arm. Thus, we were unable to demonstrate a definitive benefit of more frequent nocturnal hemodialysis for either coprimary outcome.
先前的小型研究表明,与传统每周三次的治疗相比,频繁夜间血液透析有多种益处。为了进一步研究这个问题,我们将 87 名患者随机分为每周三次的常规血液透析组或每周六次的夜间血液透析组,所有患者均使用单次使用高通量透析器。在频繁夜间组的 45 名患者中,每周标准 Kt/V(尿素)的平均值高出 1.82 倍,每周治疗次数的平均值高出 1.74 倍,每周治疗时间的平均值高出 2.45 倍,而常规组的 42 名患者则分别高出 1.82 倍、1.74 倍和 2.45 倍。我们没有发现夜间血液透析对两个主要结局(死亡或左心室质量(通过 MRI 测量)的风险比为 0.68,或死亡或 RAND 身体健康综合评分的风险比为 0.91)有显著影响。左心室质量结果的可能解释包括样本量有限和患者特征。次要结局包括认知表现、自我报告的抑郁、营养、矿物质代谢和贫血的实验室标志物、血压和住院率以及血管通路干预。夜间组患者的高磷血症和高血压控制得到改善,但其他主要次要结局没有显著获益。夜间组血管通路事件有增加的趋势。因此,我们无法证明更频繁的夜间血液透析对任何主要结局都有明确的益处。