• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左主干交叉支架置入后左回旋支开口病变介入治疗中血流储备分数与血管造影比较。

Fractional flow reserve versus angiography in left circumflex ostial intervention after left main crossover stenting.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University College of Medicine, Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, Korea.

出版信息

Korean Circ J. 2011 Jun;41(6):304-7. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2011.41.6.304. Epub 2011 Jun 30.

DOI:10.4070/kcj.2011.41.6.304
PMID:21779282
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3132691/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Discrepancy between angiographic percent (%) diameter stenosis and fractional flow reserve (FFR) exists in non-left main bifurcation lesions. The aim of this study was to compare angiographic stenosis severity and FFR in jailed ostial left circumflex artery (LCX) lesions after left main (LM)-to-left anterior descending artery (LAD) crossover stenting.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Twenty-nine (n=29) patients with distal LM or ostial LAD lesions treated by LM-to-LAD crossover stenting were consecutively enrolled. After successful stenting, FFR was measured at the jailed LCX. Additional intervention was performed in lesions with FFR <0.8.

RESULTS

The mean reference diameter of LCX was 3.1±0.4 mm, and percent diameter stenosis after crossover stenting was 56±21%. Angiographically significant stenosis (>50%) at the ostial LCX occurred in 59% (17/29) of cases. Among them, only five (29%) lesions had functional significance, and underwent additional procedure. During follow-up, three patients in the deferral group and two patients in the additional intervention group had target lesion revascularization.

CONCLUSION

There was a discrepancy between angiographic percent diameter stenosis and FFR in jailed LCX lesions after LM crossover stenting.

摘要

背景与目的

在非左主干分叉病变中,血管造影狭窄程度(%)与血流储备分数(FFR)之间存在差异。本研究旨在比较左主干(LM)至左前降支(LAD)交叉支架置入后,左回旋支(LCX)开口部被“拘禁”的病变的血管造影狭窄严重程度和 FFR。

对象与方法

连续纳入 29 例因远端 LM 或开口 LAD 病变而行 LM-LAD 交叉支架置入的患者。在成功支架置入后,测量被“拘禁”的 LCX 的 FFR。对 FFR<0.8 的病变进行进一步介入治疗。

结果

LCX 的参考直径平均为 3.1±0.4mm,交叉支架置入后的直径狭窄率为 56±21%。59%(17/29)的病例出现 LCX 开口处的血管造影狭窄程度>50%(狭窄程度>50%)。其中,仅有 5 例(29%)病变具有功能性意义,并进行了进一步的介入治疗。在随访期间,延迟组的 3 例患者和进一步介入组的 2 例患者发生了靶病变血运重建。

结论

LM 交叉支架置入后,LCX 开口部被“拘禁”的病变的血管造影狭窄程度与 FFR 之间存在差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5203/3132691/00961993312e/kcj-41-304-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5203/3132691/00961993312e/kcj-41-304-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5203/3132691/00961993312e/kcj-41-304-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Fractional flow reserve versus angiography in left circumflex ostial intervention after left main crossover stenting.左主干交叉支架置入后左回旋支开口病变介入治疗中血流储备分数与血管造影比较。
Korean Circ J. 2011 Jun;41(6):304-7. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2011.41.6.304. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
2
5-Year Outcomes According to FFR of Left Circumflex Coronary Artery After Left Main Crossover Stenting.左主干分叉病变后左回旋支经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后血流储备分数的 5 年结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 May 13;12(9):847-855. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.02.037.
3
Predictors and 3-year outcomes of compromised left circumflex coronary artery after left main crossover stenting.左主干交叉支架置入术后左回旋支临界病变的预测因素及其 3 年转归。
Clin Cardiol. 2021 Oct;44(10):1377-1385. doi: 10.1002/clc.23693. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
4
Long-term outcomes of simple crossover stenting from the left main to the left anterior descending coronary artery.从左主干到左前降支冠状动脉进行简单交叉支架置入术的长期预后。
Korean J Intern Med. 2014 Sep;29(5):597-602. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2014.29.5.597. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
5
Functional and morphological assessment of side branch after left main coronary artery bifurcation stenting with cross-over technique.采用交叉技术行左主干冠状动脉分叉处支架置入术后分支血管的功能与形态学评估
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Mar 1;83(4):545-52. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25057. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
6
Long-term prognostic value of Murray law-based quantitative flow ratio in jailed left circumflex coronary artery after left main crossover stenting.左主干交叉支架置入后罪犯回旋支基于 Murray 法的定量血流比的长期预后价值。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 16;13(1):4391. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30991-4.
7
Changes in left main bifurcation geometry after a single-stent crossover technique: an intravascular ultrasound study using direct imaging of both the left anterior descending and the left circumflex coronary arteries before and after intervention.左主干分叉病变在单支架对吻技术后的形态变化:介入治疗前后直接显示左前降支和左回旋支的血管内超声研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Aug;4(4):355-61. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.110.961045. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
8
Clinical Outcomes After Current-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Ostial Left Circumflex Lesions.经新一代药物洗脱支架植入治疗开口左回旋支病变的临床结局。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Jul;40:57-61. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.11.009. Epub 2021 Nov 7.
9
Calcification analysis by intravascular ultrasound to define a predictor of left circumflex narrowing after cross-over stenting for unprotected left main bifurcation lesions.通过血管内超声进行钙化分析,以确定无保护左主干分叉病变交叉支架置入术后左旋支狭窄的预测指标。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2014 Mar;15(2):80-5. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2014.01.014. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
10
Intravascular ultrasound assessment of distal left main bifurcation disease: the importance of the polygon of confluence of the left main, left anterior descending, and left circumflex arteries.血管内超声评估左主干分叉病变远端:左主干、前降支和回旋支汇聚区多边形的重要性。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Nov 1;82(5):737-45. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23263. Epub 2013 Mar 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Complex Left Main Trifurcation: A Case Study of Successful Treatment.复杂左主干三分叉:成功治疗的病例研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 8;14(2):328. doi: 10.3390/jcm14020328.
2
Practical Application of Coronary Physiologic Assessment: Asia-Pacific Expert Consensus Document: Part 2.冠状动脉生理评估的实际应用:亚太专家共识文件:第2部分。
JACC Asia. 2023 Sep 12;3(6):825-842. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2023.07.004. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Percutaneous Treatment of Left Main Disease: A Review of Current Status.经皮治疗左主干病变:现状综述

本文引用的文献

1
Three-year outcomes after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: insights from the j-Cypher registry.西罗莫司洗脱支架植入治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病的三年预后:来自j-Cypher注册研究的见解
Circulation. 2009 Nov 10;120(19):1866-74. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.873349. Epub 2009 Oct 26.
2
Physiological evaluation of the provisional side-branch intervention strategy for bifurcation lesions using fractional flow reserve.使用血流储备分数对分叉病变临时边支介入策略进行生理学评估。
Eur Heart J. 2008 Mar;29(6):726-32. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn045. Epub 2008 Feb 28.
3
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 28;12(15):4972. doi: 10.3390/jcm12154972.
4
Long-term prognostic value of Murray law-based quantitative flow ratio in jailed left circumflex coronary artery after left main crossover stenting.左主干交叉支架置入后罪犯回旋支基于 Murray 法的定量血流比的长期预后价值。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 16;13(1):4391. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30991-4.
5
5-Year Outcome of Simple Crossover Stenting in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Compared With Side Branch Opening.与侧支开口相比,冠状动脉分叉病变单纯交叉支架置入术的5年预后
JACC Asia. 2021 Jun 15;1(1):53-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.04.002. eCollection 2021 Jun.
6
Long-term outcomes following ostial left anterior descending artery intervention with or without crossover to left-main.左前降支开口处介入治疗(无论是否交叉至左主干)后的长期预后
Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2022 Apr 15;12(2):73-80. eCollection 2022.
7
Predictors and 3-year outcomes of compromised left circumflex coronary artery after left main crossover stenting.左主干交叉支架置入术后左回旋支临界病变的预测因素及其 3 年转归。
Clin Cardiol. 2021 Oct;44(10):1377-1385. doi: 10.1002/clc.23693. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
8
Stenting of left main coronary artery stenosis: A to Z.左主干冠状动脉狭窄的支架置入术:从A到Z
Heart Asia. 2013 Jan 25;5(1):18-27. doi: 10.1136/heartasia-2012-010218. eCollection 2013.
9
Practical based approach to left main bifurcation stenting.基于实践的左主干分叉病变支架置入术方法。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Feb 19;16:49. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0227-1.
10
Fractional flow reserve: Current applications and overview of the available data.血流储备分数:当前应用及现有数据概述
World J Clin Cases. 2015 Aug 16;3(8):678-81. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v3.i8.678.
2007 Focused Update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: 2007 Writing Group to Review New Evidence and Update the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Writing on Behalf of the 2005 Writing Committee.
《美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南2005年更新:2007年重点更新》:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告:2007年写作组审查新证据并更新《美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南2005年更新》,代表2005年写作委员会撰写
Circulation. 2008 Jan 15;117(2):261-95. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.188208. Epub 2007 Dec 13.
4
Haemodynamic significance of ostial side branch nipping following percutaneous intervention at bifurcations: a pressure wire pilot study.经皮介入分叉病变时开口侧支夹闭的血流动力学意义:一项压力导丝初步研究
Heart. 2007 Feb;93(2):249-50. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2006.088690.
5
Comparison of simple and complex stenting techniques in the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery bifurcation stenosis.单纯与复杂支架置入技术治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉狭窄的比较
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Jun 1;97(11):1597-601. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.12.051. Epub 2006 Apr 7.
6
Physiologic assessment of jailed side branch lesions using fractional flow reserve.使用血流储备分数对闭塞侧支病变进行生理学评估。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Aug 16;46(4):633-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.054.
7
Utility of coronary physiologic hemodynamics for bifurcation, aorto-ostial, and ostial branch stenoses to guide treatment decisions.冠状动脉生理血流动力学在分叉病变、主动脉开口病变和开口分支狭窄中用于指导治疗决策的效用。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005 Aug;65(4):461-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20435.
8
Lack of relation between imaging and physiology in ostial coronary artery narrowings.冠状动脉开口狭窄的影像学与生理学之间缺乏相关性。
Am J Cardiol. 2004 Jun 1;93(11):1404-7, A9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.02.041.
9
Randomized study to evaluate sirolimus-eluting stents implanted at coronary bifurcation lesions.评估在冠状动脉分叉病变处植入西罗莫司洗脱支架的随机研究。
Circulation. 2004 Mar 16;109(10):1244-9. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000118474.71662.E3. Epub 2004 Feb 23.
10
Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis?冠状动脉造影的视觉解读能否预测冠状动脉狭窄的生理重要性?
N Engl J Med. 1984 Mar 29;310(13):819-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198403293101304.