Magalhães Fernanda Pedreira, Costa Elaine Fiod, Cariello Angelino Júlio, Rodrigues Eduardo Buchele, Hofling-Lima Ana Luisa
Department of Ophthalmology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2011 Mar-Apr;74(2):110-3. doi: 10.1590/s0004-27492011000200008.
To compare the clinical classification of cataract using the Lens Opacities Classification System (LOCS) III with the mean values of lens density provided by the Pentacam Scheimpflug System in nuclear cataracts.
One hundred and one eyes from 101 patients with age-related nuclear cataract were submitted to clinical examination for lens grading score using LOCS III. According to LOCS III, nuclear opalescence was divided in six groups. Patients were evaluated by the Pentacam Scheimpflug System for the mean lens density using the Pentacam lens densitometry program (PLDP), the Pentacam Nucleus Staging (PNS) mean value and the PNS cataract grading score.
A positive correlation between the mean values of lens density and LOCS III classification, considering groups 1 to 5, could be noticed with PLDP and PNS mean value. The mean values between the groups were similar using the PLDP and the PNS mean value. However, when the PNS cataract grading score was evaluated, there was low correspondence with LOCS III classification.
Pentacam Scheimpflug device offers an objective measure of the lens nuclear density on nuclear cataracts. PLDP and the PNS mean value were both useful to evaluate age-related nuclear cataract up to LOCS III group 5.
比较使用晶状体混浊分类系统(LOCS)III对白内障进行的临床分类与Pentacam Scheimpflug系统提供的核性白内障晶状体密度平均值。
对101例年龄相关性核性白内障患者的101只眼进行临床检查,使用LOCS III对晶状体进行分级评分。根据LOCS III,核混浊分为六组。使用Pentacam Scheimpflug系统通过Pentacam晶状体密度测量程序(PLDP)、Pentacam核分级(PNS)平均值和PNS白内障分级评分对患者进行平均晶状体密度评估。
考虑1至5组,使用PLDP和PNS平均值可发现晶状体密度平均值与LOCS III分类之间存在正相关。使用PLDP和PNS平均值时,各组之间的平均值相似。然而,当评估PNS白内障分级评分时,与LOCS III分类的对应性较低。
Pentacam Scheimpflug设备可对核性白内障的晶状体核密度进行客观测量。PLDP和PNS平均值在评估LOCS III第5组之前的年龄相关性核性白内障时均有用。