Suppr超能文献

人血清中促炎细胞因子的多重测量:Meso Scale Discovery 电化学发光检测法与 Cytometric Bead Array 的比较。

Multiplex measurement of proinflammatory cytokines in human serum: comparison of the Meso Scale Discovery electrochemiluminescence assay and the Cytometric Bead Array.

机构信息

W. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205-1901, USA.

出版信息

J Immunol Methods. 2011 Sep 30;372(1-2):71-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2011.06.033. Epub 2011 Jul 18.

Abstract

Serum cytokine profiling is a powerful tool to link host immune defense with disease pathogenesis. Although several multiplex assays are commercially available, none has been rigorously validated in the context of chronic infectious disease (such as HIV infection). Here we compared the measurement of proinflammatory cytokines by two multiplex platforms: the Meso Scale Discovery (MSD) electrochemiluminescence assay and the Becton Dickinson Cytometric Bead Array (CBA) flow cytometric assay, using serum samples from HIV-infected and -uninfected donors. We evaluated the ability of these assays to: a) quantify circulating levels of native cytokines (IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNF-α, IL-12p70, IL-1β), and b) accurately recover known amounts of recombinant cytokines added to serum samples. Based on the standard curves, the sensitivity of the MSD system was only slightly better than the CBA. However, in serum the MSD platform consistently quantified levels of endogenous IL-12p70, TNF-α, and IL-10 that were undetectable by the CBA assay. The MSD assay was also more accurate as determined by an enhanced capacity to recover known concentrations of recombinant cytokines added to serum. Both assays performed equally well in quantifying IL-6 and IL-8, while neither assay quantified IL-1β with accuracy and precision. Interestingly, HIV infection did not affect the performance of either assay. Overall, the MSD assay provided a more reliable assessment of the proinflammatory cytokines tested in the serum of healthy and HIV-infected individuals.

摘要

血清细胞因子谱分析是将宿主免疫防御与疾病发病机制联系起来的有力工具。尽管有几种多重分析试剂盒已经商业化,但在慢性传染病(如 HIV 感染)的背景下,没有一种得到过严格验证。在这里,我们比较了两种多重平台(Meso Scale Discovery [MSD] 电化学发光测定法和 Becton Dickinson Cytometric Bead Array [CBA] 流式细胞术测定法)测量促炎细胞因子的能力,使用来自 HIV 感染和未感染供体的血清样本。我们评估了这些测定法的能力:a)定量循环中天然细胞因子(IL-6、IL-8、IL-10、TNF-α、IL-12p70、IL-1β)的水平,和 b)准确恢复添加到血清样本中的已知量重组细胞因子。基于标准曲线,MSD 系统的灵敏度仅略优于 CBA。然而,在血清中,MSD 平台始终能够定量检测到 CBA 测定法无法检测到的内源性 IL-12p70、TNF-α 和 IL-10。MSD 测定法还通过增强对添加到血清中的已知浓度重组细胞因子的恢复能力,具有更高的准确性。两种测定法在定量 IL-6 和 IL-8 方面表现相当,而两种测定法都无法准确和精确地定量 IL-1β。有趣的是,HIV 感染并未影响两种测定法的性能。总体而言,MSD 测定法在评估健康和 HIV 感染个体血清中的促炎细胞因子方面提供了更可靠的评估。

相似文献

6
Multisite comparison of high-sensitivity multiplex cytokine assays.高灵敏度多重细胞因子检测的多中心比较
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2011 Aug;18(8):1229-42. doi: 10.1128/CVI.05032-11. Epub 2011 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Multisite comparison of high-sensitivity multiplex cytokine assays.高灵敏度多重细胞因子检测的多中心比较
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2011 Aug;18(8):1229-42. doi: 10.1128/CVI.05032-11. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
2
Comparison of multiplex immunoassay platforms.多重免疫分析平台的比较。
Clin Chem. 2010 Feb;56(2):314-8. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2009.135087. Epub 2009 Dec 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验