• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制极差的原因。

Exploring reasons for very poor glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes.

机构信息

Department of Diabetes and Metabolism, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.

出版信息

Prim Care Diabetes. 2011 Dec;5(4):251-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2011.07.001. Epub 2011 Jul 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.pcd.2011.07.001
PMID:21782539
Abstract

AIM

The aim was to determine prevalence and reasons for very poor glycaemic control (HbA1c≥10% [86 mmol/mol]) amongst people with Type 2 diabetes in an ethnically diverse urban population.

METHODS

Databases of three primary health centres were searched for patients with Type 2 diabetes ≥1 year, most recent HbA1c≥10% [86 mmol/mol]. Patients were invited to explore reasons for poor glycaemic control and develop an individualised management plan. Review of glycaemic control was undertaken at 6 months.

RESULTS

Of a total population of 28,677, 1261 had Type 2 diabetes (4.4%). 143 (11.3%) had last recorded HbA1c≥10% [86 mmol/mol]; 128 were reviewed (46.9% South Asian). People with poorer control had longer duration of diabetes and more South Asian ethnicity. Reasons for poor glycaemic control were:

THERAPY

lack of titration of tablets (7.8%) or insulin (12.5%), poor concordance with medication (14.0%), insulin refusal (11.7%), side effects (16.4%); Engagement: poor concordance with lifestyle (26.5%), lack of knowledge of diabetes (14.0%), infrequent attendance at clinic (16.4%); Psychosocial/mental health: denial that diabetes was a problem (7.0%), mental health problem (9.4%), social issues (10.9%); Occupation: refusal of insulin due to occupation (1.6%); difficulty in attending reviews (5.5%). At six month review, 54.5% of patients had improved HbA1c≥1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Poor control affects 1 in 10 of our population. We have determined a number of factors which may explain most causes. Individualised management using care planning can significantly improve control.

摘要

目的

旨在确定在一个种族多样化的城市人群中,2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制极差(HbA1c≥10%[86mmol/mol])的患病率和原因。

方法

在三个初级保健中心的数据库中搜索患有 2 型糖尿病≥1 年且最近 HbA1c≥10%[86mmol/mol]的患者。邀请患者探讨血糖控制不佳的原因,并制定个体化管理计划。在 6 个月时对血糖控制进行复查。

结果

在总共 28677 人中,有 1261 人患有 2 型糖尿病(4.4%)。有 143 人(11.3%)最后一次记录的 HbA1c≥10%[86mmol/mol];128 人接受了复查(46.9%为南亚裔)。血糖控制较差的患者糖尿病病程较长,南亚裔人口比例较高。血糖控制不佳的原因包括:

治疗

药物(7.8%)或胰岛素(12.5%)剂量未调整,药物治疗依从性差(14.0%),拒绝胰岛素治疗(11.7%),药物副作用(16.4%);

参与

生活方式不依从(26.5%),对糖尿病知识缺乏(14.0%),就诊不频繁(16.4%);

心理社会/心理健康:否认糖尿病是个问题(7.0%),心理健康问题(9.4%),社会问题(10.9%);

职业

因职业原因拒绝胰岛素(1.6%),难以参加复查(5.5%)。在 6 个月的复查中,有 54.5%的患者 HbA1c≥1%得到改善。

结论

我们的人群中有 1/10 的患者血糖控制不佳。我们已经确定了一些可能解释大多数原因的因素。使用护理计划进行个体化管理可以显著改善控制。

相似文献

1
Exploring reasons for very poor glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes.探索 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制极差的原因。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2011 Dec;5(4):251-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2011.07.001. Epub 2011 Jul 22.
2
Distinct trajectories of HbA in newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes from the DPV registry using a longitudinal group-based modelling approach.采用纵向基于群组的建模方法对 DPV 登记处新诊断的 2 型糖尿病患者的 HbA 进行的轨迹分析。
Diabet Med. 2019 Nov;36(11):1468-1477. doi: 10.1111/dme.14103. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
3
Association between the 8-item Morisky medication adherence scale (MMAS-8) score and glycaemic control among Chinese diabetes patients.中国糖尿病患者中8项版莫里西药物治疗依从性量表(MMAS-8)评分与血糖控制之间的关联。
J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Mar;55(3):279-87. doi: 10.1002/jcph.408. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
4
Disease related knowledge, medication adherence and glycaemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Pakistan.巴基斯坦2型糖尿病患者的疾病相关知识、用药依从性和血糖控制情况
Prim Care Diabetes. 2016 Apr;10(2):136-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2015.09.004. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
5
The impact of intensified clinical care on glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes at Khayelitsha Community Health Centre, South Africa: Quasi-experimental study.南非开耶利察社区卫生中心强化临床护理对 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制的影响:准实验研究。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2020 Apr;14(2):97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2019.08.006. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
6
Why do some people with type 2 diabetes who are using insulin have poor glycaemic control? A qualitative study.为什么有些使用胰岛素的 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制不佳?一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2015 Jan 29;5(1):e006407. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006407.
7
Barriers to Diabetes Self-Management in a Subset of New Zealand Adults with Type 2 Diabetes and Poor Glycaemic Control.新西兰部分血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病成人患者自我管理障碍研究
J Diabetes Res. 2021 May 27;2021:5531146. doi: 10.1155/2021/5531146. eCollection 2021.
8
Adherence to medication, glycaemic control and hospital attendance in young adults with type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病青年患者的药物依从性、血糖控制及就医情况
Intern Med J. 2018 Jun;48(6):728-731. doi: 10.1111/imj.13808.
9
Glycaemic control status among type 2 diabetic patients and the role of their diabetes coping behaviours: a clinic-based study in Tripoli, Libya.2型糖尿病患者的血糖控制状况及其糖尿病应对行为的作用:利比亚的黎波里一项基于诊所的研究。
Libyan J Med. 2016 Mar 21;11:31086. doi: 10.3402/ljm.v11.31086. eCollection 2016.
10
Self-knowledge of HbA1c in people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and its association with glycaemic control.2型糖尿病患者对糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)的自我认知及其与血糖控制的关联。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2017 Oct;11(5):414-420. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2017.03.011. Epub 2017 Jul 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Determinants of poor glycemic control among type 2 diabetes in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.埃塞俄比亚 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制不佳的决定因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 5;12:1256024. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1256024. eCollection 2024.
2
Restoring glucose balance: Conditional HMGB1 knockdown mitigates hyperglycemia in a Streptozotocin induced mouse model.恢复葡萄糖平衡:条件性HMGB1基因敲低减轻链脲佐菌素诱导的小鼠模型中的高血糖症
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 12;10(1):e23561. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23561. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.
3
Glycaemic monitoring and control among high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes in Australian general practice during COVID-19.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,澳大利亚全科医疗中 2 型糖尿病高危患者的血糖监测和控制情况。
Fam Med Community Health. 2023 Aug;11(3). doi: 10.1136/fmch-2023-002271.
4
Challenges of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Management From the Perspective of Patients: Conventional Content Analysis.从患者角度看2型糖尿病管理的挑战:传统内容分析
Interact J Med Res. 2022 Oct 27;11(2):e41933. doi: 10.2196/41933.
5
Synthesis of Novel -Methylmorpholine-Substituted Benzimidazolium Salts as Potential α-Glucosidase Inhibitors.新型 -N-甲基吗啉取代苯并咪唑鎓盐的合成及其作为潜在α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂的研究。
Molecules. 2022 Sep 15;27(18):6012. doi: 10.3390/molecules27186012.
6
Digital Interventions Supporting Self-care in People With Type 2 Diabetes Across Greater Manchester (Greater Manchester Diabetes My Way): Protocol for a Mixed Methods Evaluation.支持大曼彻斯特地区2型糖尿病患者自我护理的数字干预措施(大曼彻斯特糖尿病自我管理之路):一项混合方法评估方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Aug 17;11(8):e26237. doi: 10.2196/26237.
7
What do persons with diabetes want from community pharmacies? A qualitative study.糖尿病患者对社区药房有何期望?一项定性研究。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2022 Apr-Jun;20(2):2677. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2022.2.2677. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
8
A Smartphone-Based Application to Assist Insulin Titration in Patients Undergoing Basal Insulin-Supported Oral Antidiabetic Treatment.基于智能手机的应用程序辅助基础胰岛素治疗的口服降糖药物治疗患者的胰岛素剂量调整。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Jul;17(4):988-997. doi: 10.1177/19322968221090521. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
9
The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Glycemic Monitoring and Other Processes of Care for Type 2 Diabetes: Protocol for a Retrospective Cohort Study.2019年冠状病毒病大流行对2型糖尿病血糖监测及其他护理流程的影响:一项回顾性队列研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Apr 22;11(4):e35971. doi: 10.2196/35971.
10
Qualitative exploration of the experiences of community pharmacists delivering the Diabetes MedsCheck service.定性探索社区药剂师提供糖尿病药物检查服务的体验。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2022 Aug;47(8):1194-1200. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13654. Epub 2022 Mar 24.