Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Systems, University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, WA 98195-7266, USA.
Semin Oncol Nurs. 2011 Aug;27(3):183-91. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2011.04.003.
Many technologies intended for patient use are never developed or evaluated with principles of user-centered design. In this review, we explore different approaches to assessing usability and acceptability, drawn from selected exemplar studies in the health sciences literature.
Peer-reviewed research manuscripts were selected from Medline and other data sources accessible through pubmed.gov. We also present a framework for developing patient-centered technologies that we recently employed.
While there are studies using principles of user-centered design, many more do not report formative usability testing results and may only report post-hoc satisfaction surveys. Consequently, adoption by user groups may be limited.
We encourage nurses in practice to look for and examine usability testing results before considering implementation of any patient-centered technology.
许多旨在供患者使用的技术从未采用以用户为中心的设计原则进行开发或评估。在这篇综述中，我们从健康科学文献中的选定范例研究中探讨了评估可用性和可接受性的不同方法。
从 Medline 和可通过 pubmed.gov 访问的其他数据源中选择经过同行评审的研究手稿。我们还提出了一个用于开发以患者为中心的技术的框架，我们最近采用了该框架。
虽然有一些研究采用了以用户为中心的设计原则，但更多的研究并未报告形成性可用性测试结果，并且可能仅报告事后满意度调查。因此，用户群体的采用可能会受到限制。
我们鼓励实践中的护士在考虑实施任何以患者为中心的技术之前，寻找并检查可用性测试结果。
