Institute of Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2011 Oct;4(7):1234-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.04.008. Epub 2011 Apr 16.
Osmotic phenomena influence the intervertebral disc biomechanics. Their simulation is challenging and can be undertaken at different levels of complexity. Four distinct approaches to simulate the osmotic behaviour of the intervertebral disc (a fixed boundary pore pressure model, a fixed osmotic pressure gradient model in the whole disc or only in the nucleus pulposus, and a swelling model with strain-dependent osmotic pressure) were analysed. Predictions were compared using a 3D poroelastic finite element model of a L4-L5 spinal unit under three different loading conditions: free swelling for 8 h and two daily loading cycles: (i) 200 N compression for 8 h followed by 500 N compression for 16 h; (ii) 500 N for 8 h followed by 1000 N for 16 h. Overall, all swelling models calculated comparable results, with differences decreasing under greater loads. Results predicted with the fixed boundary pore pressure and the fixed osmotic pressure in the whole disc models were nearly identical. The boundary pore pressure model, however, cannot simulate differential osmotic pressures in disc regions. The swelling model offered the best potential to provide more accurate results, conditional upon availability of reliable values for the required coefficients and material properties. Possible fields of application include mechanobiology investigations and crack opening and propagation. However, the other approaches are a good compromise between the ease of implementation and the reliability of results, especially when considering higher loads or when the focus is on global results such as spinal kinematics.
渗透现象影响椎间盘生物力学。其模拟具有挑战性,可以在不同的复杂程度下进行。本文分析了四种不同的方法来模拟椎间盘的渗透行为(固定边界孔隙压力模型、整个椎间盘或仅核髓核中的固定渗透压力梯度模型,以及应变相关渗透压力的肿胀模型)。使用 L4-L5 脊柱单元的三维多孔弹性有限元模型在三种不同的加载条件下比较了预测结果:自由膨胀 8 小时和两个日常加载循环:(i)200 N 压缩 8 小时,然后 500 N 压缩 16 小时;(ii)500 N 压缩 8 小时,然后 1000 N 压缩 16 小时。总体而言,所有肿胀模型的计算结果都相当,随着载荷的增加,差异减小。固定边界孔隙压力和整个椎间盘模型中固定渗透压力模型预测的结果几乎相同。然而,边界孔隙压力模型无法模拟椎间盘区域的差异渗透压力。肿胀模型提供了提供更准确结果的最佳潜力,这取决于所需系数和材料特性的可靠值。可能的应用领域包括机械生物学研究以及裂纹张开和扩展。然而,其他方法在实施的简便性和结果的可靠性之间是一个很好的折衷,尤其是在考虑更高的载荷或关注全局结果(如脊柱运动学)时。