Department of Clinical Radiology, University of Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Strasse 33, 48149 Muenster, Germany.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Aug;197(2):W226-32. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5924.
This study evaluated three different injection systems with regard to microbiological contamination, time efficiency, and user handling during a clinical routine.
A total of 825 patients were included. A double-syringe contrast injector with disposable syringes (system A; n = 150) and one that used prefilled syringes (system B; n = 150) were microbiologically analyzed during single use of the syringes in one patient. Moreover, the contamination of a roller pump injector capable of multidosing several patients from a contrast agent container, without the need for prior filling, was determined after being used for an entire day (system C; n = 35 injections/day for 15 days). The hygienic background was guaranteed by taking imprints of the surfaces of devices and the palms of the hands of members of CT staff before the clinical investigation. The time required for assembly of the injection systems and for filling or refilling of each injector system was measured. The handling of the three systems also was subjectively ranked by the technicians.
Injection systems A, B, and C remained microbiologically sterile and free of contamination throughout their use in clinical routine. The mean (± SD) time for injection system assembly and installation of syringes and filling did not differ significantly between injection systems A and B (system A, 2.5 ± 1.1 minutes; system B, 1.9 ± 1.3 minutes; p = 0.12), whereas the time for assembly of system C was significantly shorter (0.9 ± 0.6 minutes; p < 0.05 vs system A; p < 0.05 vs system B). In the subjective ranking of injector handling, systems B and C were preferred.
Double-syringe injectors used with disposable or prefilled contrast agent syringes, as well as roller pump injectors, ensure hygienic conditions in clinical routine. However, time efficiency and handling are aspects that favor prefilled and roller pump systems.
本研究旨在评估三种不同的注射系统在临床常规中微生物污染、时间效率和用户处理方面的情况。
共纳入 825 例患者。在单名患者单次使用注射器时,对使用一次性注射器的双注射器造影剂注射器(系统 A;n = 150)和使用预填充注射器的注射器(系统 B;n = 150)进行微生物分析。此外,还确定了一种可从造影剂容器中多次为多名患者给药而无需预先填充的滚柱泵注射器(系统 C)在使用一整天后的污染情况(每天 35 次注射,共 15 天)。在临床研究之前,通过对 CT 工作人员的设备表面和手掌进行印痕取样,保证了卫生背景。测量了组装注射系统以及填充或重新填充每个注射器系统所需的时间。技术人员还对三个系统的操作进行了主观评分。
在临床常规使用过程中,注射系统 A、B 和 C 始终保持无菌和无污染状态。注射系统 A 和 B 的组装和安装注射器以及填充时间的平均值(± SD)差异无统计学意义(系统 A,2.5 ± 1.1 分钟;系统 B,1.9 ± 1.3 分钟;p = 0.12),而系统 C 的组装时间明显更短(0.9 ± 0.6 分钟;p < 0.05 与系统 A;p < 0.05 与系统 B)。在注射器操作的主观评分中,系统 B 和 C 更受欢迎。
在临床常规中,使用一次性或预填充造影剂注射器的双注射器注射器以及滚柱泵注射器可确保卫生条件。然而,时间效率和操作是倾向于预填充和滚柱泵系统的方面。