University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, 1 Williams Street, P.O. Box 38, Solomons, MD 20688, USA.
Environ Manage. 2011 Oct;48(4):710-33. doi: 10.1007/s00267-011-9726-0. Epub 2011 Jul 24.
Increasingly government agencies are seeking to quantify the outcomes of proposed policy options in terms of ecosystem service benefits, yet conflicting definitions and ad hoc approaches to measuring ecosystem services have created confusion regarding how to rigorously link ecological change to changes in human well-being. Here, we describe a step-by-step framework for producing ecological models and metrics that can effectively serve an economic-benefits assessment of a proposed change in policy or management. A focus of the framework is developing comparable units of ecosystem goods and services to support decision-making, even if outcomes cannot be monetized. Because the challenges to translating ecological changes to outcomes appropriate for economic analyses are many, we discuss examples that demonstrate practical methods and approaches to overcoming data limitations. The numerous difficult decisions that government agencies must make to fairly use and allocate natural resources provides ample opportunity for interdisciplinary teams of natural and social scientists to improve methods for quantifying changes in ecosystem services and their effects on human well-being. This framework is offered with the intent of promoting the success of such teams as they support managers in evaluating the equivalency of ecosystem service offsets and trades, establishing restoration and preservation priorities, and more generally, in developing environmental policy that effectively balances multiple perspectives.
越来越多的政府机构正试图从生态系统服务效益的角度量化拟议政策方案的结果,但生态系统服务的定义存在冲突,衡量方法也各不相同,这导致如何严格将生态变化与人类福祉的变化联系起来变得令人困惑。在这里,我们描述了一个逐步的框架,用于生成生态模型和指标,以便有效地对政策或管理的拟议变化进行经济利益评估。该框架的重点是开发可比的生态系统商品和服务单位,以支持决策,即使无法对结果进行货币化。由于将生态变化转化为适合经济分析的结果存在许多挑战,我们讨论了一些例子,展示了克服数据限制的实际方法和方法。政府机构必须做出许多艰难的决策,以公平地利用和分配自然资源,这为自然和社会科学家的跨学科团队提供了充分的机会,以改进衡量生态系统服务变化及其对人类福祉影响的方法。提供此框架是为了促进这些团队的成功,因为它们支持管理者评估生态系统服务抵消和交易的等效性,确定恢复和保护的优先事项,以及更普遍地制定有效平衡多种观点的环境政策。