Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 May;141(2):199-205. doi: 10.1037/a0024617. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
Real-world perspective-taking problems frequently involve interactions among individuals, suggesting a potential social element to this seemingly spatial problem. Previous studies have suggested that the agency of the target in a perspective-taking task might influence reasoning. This hypothesis is tested directly by manipulating whether one takes the perspective of a potential agent or an object. The results were striking: Even though no overall differences in performance were observed with and without agents, performance was differentially associated with social skills. In particular, participants with better social skills were more accurate than less social peers when the target was a potential agent, whereas no such relationship was observed when the target was an object. These results suggest that bringing domain-specific investigations to bear on real-world problems requires understanding how that domain exists in the broader context of interacting skills and biases.
现实世界中的换位思考问题经常涉及到个体之间的相互作用,这表明这个看似空间性的问题可能存在潜在的社会性因素。先前的研究表明,在换位思考任务中目标的主体身份可能会影响推理。通过直接操纵参与者是从潜在主体还是从物体的角度来进行换位思考,该假说得到了验证。结果令人惊讶:尽管在有和没有主体的情况下,参与者的表现没有总体差异,但表现与社会技能存在差异关联。特别是,当目标是潜在主体时,社会技能较好的参与者比社会技能较差的参与者更准确,而当目标是物体时,则没有观察到这种关系。这些结果表明,将特定领域的研究应用于现实世界的问题需要理解该领域在相互作用的技能和偏见的更广泛背景下是如何存在的。