• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

空间视角-taking:社会、方向和互动线索的影响。

Spatial perspective taking: Effects of social, directional, and interactive cues.

机构信息

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2019 Jul;47(5):1031-1043. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00910-y.

DOI:10.3758/s13421-019-00910-y
PMID:30783909
Abstract

Including an avatar in the array in a spatial perspective-taking test improves performance, but it is not clear why. Different aspects of an avatar, including its directional nature, its agency (perceived ability for action), and its interactivity, may all influence perspective-taking performance. Experiment 1 examined how performance was influenced by a social directional cue (an avatar) and an abstract directional cue (an arrow). Participants performed best in the avatar condition and no better in the arrow condition than in a control condition. These results suggest that directionality of the cue alone is not sufficient to facilitate performance on this task. Experiment 2 compared an avatar to a concrete directional cue that was grounded in everyday experience interacting with objects, but was non-agentive (a chair). There was no significant difference between the avatar and the chair conditions, which both outperformed the control condition. Participants in both experiments and all conditions primarily reported utilizing mental simulation strategies that involved imagining themselves in the array of objects. The results suggest that grounding the task in everyday interactions with people or objects facilitates this mental simulation process and more generally enhances performance on perspective-taking tasks.

摘要

在空间视角-taking 测试中,在数组中包含一个化身可以提高表现,但不清楚原因。化身的不同方面,包括其方向性、其能动性(感知到的行动能力)和交互性,都可能影响视角-taking 表现。实验 1 检验了社交方向提示(化身)和抽象方向提示(箭头)如何影响表现。参与者在化身条件下表现最好,而在箭头条件下并不比控制条件下更好。这些结果表明,仅提示的方向性不足以促进这项任务的表现。实验 2 将化身与具体的方向提示进行了比较,该提示源于与物体交互的日常经验,但不具有能动性(椅子)。化身条件和椅子条件之间没有显著差异,这两种条件都优于控制条件。两个实验中的参与者和所有条件下的参与者主要报告使用了涉及想象自己处于物体数组中的心理模拟策略。结果表明,将任务扎根于与人和物体的日常交互中,可以促进这种心理模拟过程,并更普遍地增强视角-taking 任务的表现。

相似文献

1
Spatial perspective taking: Effects of social, directional, and interactive cues.空间视角-taking:社会、方向和互动线索的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2019 Jul;47(5):1031-1043. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00910-y.
2
Directionality eclipses agency: How both directional and social cues improve spatial perspective taking.方向性遮蔽施动性:方向和社会线索如何改善空间视角-taking。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Aug;28(4):1289-1300. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01896-y. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
3
Seeing the world through the eyes of an avatar? Comparing perspective taking and referential coding.透过虚拟形象看世界?比较视角-taking 和指称编码。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Mar;46(3):264-273. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000711.
4
Changing perspective: The role of vestibular signals.转变视角:前庭信号的作用
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Dec;79(Pt B):175-85. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.08.022. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
5
Similarities and differences in visual and spatial perspective-taking processes.视觉和空间视角-taking 过程的异同。
Cognition. 2013 Nov;129(2):426-38. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.06.008. Epub 2013 Sep 14.
6
Visual perspective taking for avatars in a Simon task.西蒙任务中虚拟角色的视觉视角采择
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Jan;81(1):158-172. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1573-0.
7
Level 2 perspective taking entails two processes: evidence from PRP experiments.二级观点采择包含两个过程:来自 PRP 实验的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Nov;39(6):1878-87. doi: 10.1037/a0033336. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
8
The effects of body direction and posture on taking the perspective of a humanoid avatar in a virtual environment.身体方向和姿势对在虚拟环境中采用人形化身视角的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 21;16(12):e0261063. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261063. eCollection 2021.
9
Age of avatar modulates the altercentric bias in a visual perspective-taking task: ERP and behavioral evidence.头像年龄调节视觉观点采择任务中的利己偏向:ERP 和行为证据。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018 Dec;18(6):1298-1319. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-0641-1.
10
Reference frames in spatial updating when body-based cues are absent.在缺乏基于身体线索时空间更新中的参考框架。
Mem Cognit. 2018 Jan;46(1):32-42. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0743-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the neural basis and modulating factors of implicit altercentric spatial perspective-taking with fNIRS.用功能性近红外光谱技术探索内隐的他人中心空间视角-taking 的神经基础和调节因素。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 23;13(1):20627. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46205-w.
2
Visuospatial perspective taking in people with Down syndrome.唐氏综合征患者的空间视觉观点采择。
Res Dev Disabil. 2023 Aug;139:104565. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2023.104565. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
3
Impact of Spatial Orientation Ability on Air Traffic Conflict Detection in a Simulated Free Route Airspace Environment.

本文引用的文献

1
A Tale of Two Types of Perspective Taking: Sex Differences in Spatial Ability.两种视角的故事:空间能力的性别差异。
Psychol Sci. 2016 Nov;27(11):1507-1516. doi: 10.1177/0956797616667459. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
2
Variations in cognitive maps: understanding individual differences in navigation.认知地图的差异:理解导航中的个体差异。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 May;40(3):669-682. doi: 10.1037/a0035261. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
3
The use of embodied self-rotation for visual and spatial perspective-taking.运用具身自我旋转进行视觉和空间视角转换。
空间定向能力对模拟自由航路空域环境中空中交通冲突检测的影响。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Apr 8;16:739866. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.739866. eCollection 2022.
4
Is implicit Level-2 visual perspective-taking embodied? Spontaneous perceptual simulation of others' perspectives is not impaired by motor restriction.内隐二级视觉观点采择是否具有具身性?对他人观点的自发感知模拟不受运动限制的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 Jul;75(7):1244-1258. doi: 10.1177/17470218221077102. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
5
Do People Regard Robots as Human-Like Social Partners? Evidence From Perspective-Taking in Spatial Descriptions.人们将机器人视为类人社交伙伴吗?来自空间描述中视角采择的证据。
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 5;11:578244. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.578244. eCollection 2020.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Nov 5;7:698. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00698. eCollection 2013.
4
The role of potential agents in making spatial perspective taking social.潜在代理人在使空间视角-taking 社会化中的作用。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Sep 5;7:497. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00497. eCollection 2013.
5
Strategy modulates spatial perspective-taking: evidence for dissociable disembodied and embodied routes.策略调节空间视角-taking:有区别的非具身和具身路径的证据。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Aug 13;7:457. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00457. eCollection 2013.
6
How your hand drives my eyes.你的手牵动着我的目光。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 May;9(5):705-11. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst037. Epub 2013 Apr 4.
7
Hippocampal size predicts rapid learning of a cognitive map in humans.海马体体积可预测人类对认知图的快速学习能力。
Hippocampus. 2013 Jun;23(6):515-28. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22111. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
8
Should social savvy equal good spatial skills? The interaction of social skills with spatial perspective taking.社会悟性是否等同于良好的空间技能?社会技能与空间视角-taking 的相互作用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 May;141(2):199-205. doi: 10.1037/a0024617. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
9
Seeing it their way: evidence for rapid and involuntary computation of what other people see.从他们的角度看问题:他人所见的快速且无意识计算的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Oct;36(5):1255-66. doi: 10.1037/a0018729.
10
Agency attribution and visuospatial perspective taking.机构归因和空间视角-taking。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Dec;16(6):1089-93. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.6.1089.