• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经自然腔道内镜手术前胃腔入路技术比较。

Comparison of anterior transgastric access techniques for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec;25(12):3906-11. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1818-7. Epub 2011 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-011-1818-7
PMID:21789648
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The advancement of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) into clinical practice is dependent on its safety, efficacy, and efficiency. Access is the obligatory first step in NOTES and serves as a surrogate to technical difficulties associated with this novel surgical approach. This study aimed to compare endoscopic transgastric access techniques in terms of safety, reproducibility, and efficiency.

METHODS

Seven variations for anterior transgastric NOTES access were evaluated with female domestic swine. After marking of an anterior site, electrocautery was used to create a small gastrotomy, followed by balloon dilation and entry into the peritoneal cavity. Methodologic variations incorporated the use of guidewires, electrocautery and dilation combined within a single device, support tubes, and dilation without electrocautery. Access times were recorded, and tissue injury was evaluated.

RESULTS

In 70 access attempts, the most serious complication was bleeding from the gastroepiploic vessel, controlled with electrocautery. High variability in access times was prevalent with almost all the access techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports the presumption that an anterior transgastric access technique for NOTES procedures is safe. The use of a wire to mark the site and another wire to retain the gastrotomy provided safe, efficient, and reproducible transgastric access. Comparison with laparoscopy exposed the disparity in technical challenges facing NOTES, suggesting that new technology and further refinement in methodology are required for NOTES to be clinically relevant.

摘要

背景

经自然腔道内镜外科(NOTES)进入临床实践取决于其安全性、有效性和效率。进入是NOTES 必不可少的第一步,是该新型手术方法相关技术难度的替代指标。本研究旨在比较经胃内镜入路技术在安全性、可重复性和效率方面的差异。

方法

对 7 种经胃前入路 NOTES 进入技术进行了评估,实验对象为雌性家猪。在标记前部位后,用电灼法创建一个小胃造口,然后进行球囊扩张并进入腹腔。方法学的变化包括使用导丝、电切和扩张组合在一个单一的设备中、支撑管以及不使用电切的扩张。记录进入时间,并评估组织损伤。

结果

在 70 次进入尝试中,最严重的并发症是胃网膜血管出血,用电灼法控制。几乎所有的进入技术都存在进入时间的高度变异性。

结论

本研究支持经胃前入路 NOTES 手术技术安全的假设。使用导丝标记部位,另用导丝保留胃造口,可提供安全、有效和可重复的经胃进入。与腹腔镜检查的比较暴露了NOTES 面临的技术挑战的差异,表明需要新的技术和方法学的进一步改进,使 NOTES 具有临床相关性。

相似文献

1
Comparison of anterior transgastric access techniques for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery.经自然腔道内镜手术前胃腔入路技术比较。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec;25(12):3906-11. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1818-7. Epub 2011 Jul 26.
2
Randomized comparative trial of a novel one-step needle sphincterotome versus direct incision and balloon dilation used to create gastrotomies for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) in the porcine model.新型一步式针括约肌切开刀与直接切开和球囊扩张用于创建经自然腔道内镜手术(NOTES)猪模型胃造口术的随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Sep;25(9):3116-21. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1653-x. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
3
A novel percutaneous insufflating guidewire system for transgastric natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) (with video).一种新型经皮充气引导线系统用于经胃自然腔道内镜外科手术(NOTES)(附有视频)。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Mar;27(3):1016-20. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2298-0. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
4
Pure retroperitoneal natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) transvaginal nephrectomy using standard laparoscopic instruments: a safety and feasibility study in a porcine model.使用标准腹腔镜器械经阴道行单纯腹膜后自然腔道内镜手术(NOTES)肾切除术:猪模型的安全性和可行性研究
BMC Urol. 2016 Jun 11;16(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12894-016-0145-7.
5
Rendezvous gastrotomy technique using direct percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy for transgastric cholecystectomy in hybrid natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery.在混合式自然腔道内镜手术中,使用直接经皮内镜下胃造口术的 rendezvous 胃造口术技术进行经胃胆囊切除术
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16(6):758-62. doi: 10.1007/s00534-009-0143-1. Epub 2009 Jul 15.
6
NOTES: 'pre-dilatation' as a remedy for technical issues during transgastric access.注意:“预扩张”作为经胃入路过程中技术问题的一种补救措施。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2012 Feb;62(2):111-5.
7
Efficacy and safety of transgastric closure in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery using the OTSC system and T-bar sutures: a survival study in a porcine model.经 OTSC 系统和 T 型缝线经自然腔道内镜手术(transgastric closure in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, NOTES)胃内闭合的疗效和安全性:猪模型中的生存研究。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Oct;26(10):2950-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2290-8. Epub 2012 May 2.
8
Peritoneal access, transgastric peritoneoscopy and oophorectomy - feasibility study on an experimental Swine model.经腹穿刺、经胃腹腔镜检查及卵巢切除术——在实验性猪模型上的可行性研究
Hepatogastroenterology. 2013 Jun;60(124):927-31. doi: 10.5754/hge12870. Epub 2012 Nov 16.
9
Natural orifice transgastric endoscopic wedge hepatic resection in an experimental model using an intuitively controlled master and slave transluminal endoscopic robot (MASTER).使用直观控制的主从式经腔内镜机器人(MASTER)在实验模型中进行经自然腔道胃内楔形肝切除术。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Sep;24(9):2293-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0955-8. Epub 2010 Feb 23.
10
Specialized instrumentation facilitates stable peritoneal access, gastric decompression, and visualization during transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy.专用器械有助于在经胃内镜腹膜镜检查期间实现稳定的腹膜入路、胃减压及可视化。
Surg Innov. 2013 Jun;20(3):268-72. doi: 10.1177/1553350612456101. Epub 2012 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Research progress in the treatment of gallstones with laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery: a narrative review.腹腔镜与内镜手术治疗胆结石的研究进展:一项叙述性综述
BMC Surg. 2025 May 29;25(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02977-8.
2
Evaluation of feasibility, efficiency and safety of a pure NOTES gastrojejunal bypass with gastric outlet obstruction, in an in vivo porcine model.在猪体内模型中评估伴有胃出口梗阻的纯NOTES胃空肠旁路术的可行性、效率和安全性。
Endosc Int Open. 2013 Dec;1(1):31-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1353686.

本文引用的文献

1
[Accessibility of peritoneal organs according to the routes of approach in NOTES].[根据NOTES入路方式评估腹膜内器官的可及性]
Korean J Gastroenterol. 2008 Nov;52(5):281-5.
2
Gastrotomy creation and closure for NOTES using a gastropexy technique (with video).使用胃固定技术进行NOTES的胃切开术创建与闭合(附视频)
Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Nov;68(5):948-53. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.03.1094. Epub 2008 Jul 2.
3
Comparison of transgastric access techniques for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.经胃途径用于自然腔道内镜手术的技术比较
Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Nov;68(5):940-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.02.091. Epub 2008 Jun 17.
4
MA-NOS radical sigmoidectomy: report of a transvaginal resection in the human.MA-NOS根治性乙状结肠切除术:人体经阴道切除术报告。
Surg Endosc. 2008 Jul;22(7):1717-23. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9956-2. Epub 2008 May 7.
5
Techniques for transgastric access to the peritoneal cavity.经胃进入腹腔的技术。
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2008 Apr;18(2):235-44; vii. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2008.01.002.
6
[Transvaginal cholecystectomy (NOTES) combined with minilaparoscopy].经阴道胆囊切除术(NOTES)联合微型腹腔镜检查
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2007 Dec;99(12):698-702. doi: 10.4321/s1130-01082007001200004.
7
NOTES. Transvaginal cholecystectomy: report of the first case.注释。经阴道胆囊切除术:首例病例报告。
Surg Innov. 2007 Dec;14(4):279-83. doi: 10.1177/1553350607311090.
8
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy without visible scar: combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach.无可见瘢痕的腹腔镜胆囊切除术:经阴道与经脐联合入路
Endoscopy. 2007 Oct;39(10):913-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-966911.
9
Preliminary pneumoperitoneum facilitates transgastric access into the peritoneal cavity for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a pilot study in a live porcine model.初步气腹术有助于经胃进入腹腔以进行自然腔道内镜手术:在活体猪模型中的一项初步研究。
Endoscopy. 2007 Oct;39(10):849-53. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-966844.
10
Surgery without scars: report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being.无痕手术:首例人体经腔镜胆囊切除术报告
Arch Surg. 2007 Sep;142(9):823-6; discussion 826-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.142.9.823.