University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Herston Road, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jun;28(5):1111-22. doi: 10.1007/s10554-011-9926-y. Epub 2011 Jul 26.
Exclusion of ischemia is important in patients with newly diagnosed systolic heart failure (HF). We prospectively compared standard-of-care invasive catheter angiography (iCA) and echocardiography to a novel non-invasive strategy of both Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography (CCTA) and Cardiovascular MRI (CMR) to determine the etiology of myocardial dysfunction Prospective data were collected from consecutive patients referred for iCA to investigate echocardiographically-confirmed new onset HF. CMR (1.5T GE) and dual source CCTA were performed within 2-7 days of iCA. Results were blinded and separately analyzed by expert readers. 426 coronary segments from 28 prospectively enrolled patients were analyzed by CCTA and quantitative iCA. The per-patient sensitivity and specificity of CCTA was 100% and 90%, respectively, negative predictive value (NPV) 100%, positive predictive value (PPV) 78%. Mean ejection fraction by CMR was 24%. Presence of ischemic-type LGE on CMR conferred a 67% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 90% NPV and 100% PPV. Combining CCTA with CMR conferred 100% specificity, 100% sensitivity, 100% PPV and 100% NPV for detection or exclusion of coronary disease. In patients with negative CCTA all invasive angiograms could have been avoided. In addition, two patients with no ischemic LGE by CMR had severe coronary disease on both CCTA and iCA, indicating global hibernation. This is a noteworthy finding in contrast to previous reports which suggested that absence of LGE rules out significant CAD. CCTA with CMR in newly-diagnosed HF enables non-invasive assessment of coronary artery disease, the severity and etiology of myocardial dysfunction and defines suitability for revascularization. Absence of ischemic-type LGE at CMR does not exclude CAD as a cause of LV dysfunction. A first-line strategy of functional and anatomic imaging with CMR and CCTA appears appropriate in newly diagnosed HF.
排除缺血性因素对于新发收缩性心力衰竭(HF)患者非常重要。我们前瞻性地比较了标准的有创导管血管造影术(iCA)和超声心动图与新型无创策略,即冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术(CCTA)和心血管磁共振成像(CMR),以确定心肌功能障碍的病因。前瞻性数据来自连续因超声心动图确诊新发 HF 而接受 iCA 检查的患者。在 iCA 后 2-7 天内进行 CMR(1.5T GE)和双源 CCTA。结果由专家读者进行盲法和单独分析。28 例前瞻性入组患者的 426 个冠状动脉节段进行了 CCTA 和定量 iCA 分析。CCTA 的患者敏感性和特异性分别为 100%和 90%,阴性预测值(NPV)为 100%,阳性预测值(PPV)为 78%。CMR 的平均射血分数为 24%。CMR 上存在缺血性 LGE 时,敏感性为 67%,特异性为 100%,NPV 为 90%,PPV 为 100%。CCTA 与 CMR 相结合对冠心病的检出或排除具有 100%的特异性、100%的敏感性、100%的 PPV 和 100%的 NPV。如果 CCTA 为阴性,则所有有创血管造影均可避免。此外,2 例 CMR 无缺血性 LGE 的患者在 CCTA 和 iCA 上均有严重的冠状动脉疾病,提示存在广泛冬眠。与之前的报告相比,这是一个值得注意的发现,之前的报告表明,LGE 不存在可排除严重 CAD。新发 HF 患者中 CCTA 与 CMR 可实现对冠状动脉疾病、心肌功能障碍的严重程度和病因进行无创评估,并确定是否适合血运重建。CMR 上无缺血性 LGE 并不能排除 CAD 为 LV 功能障碍的原因。CMR 和 CCTA 的功能和解剖成像一线策略似乎适用于新发 HF。