Lachter J, Jacobs R, Lavy A, Weisler A, Suissa A, Enat R, Eidelman S
Department of Gastroenterology, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.
Gastrointest Endosc. 1990 Jan-Feb;36(1):19-21. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(90)70915-7.
The aim of this work was to compare the efficacy of the Cetacaine topical anesthetic spray preparation to placebo. Cetacaine and placebo, from coded but otherwise identically packaged and scented sprays, were administered to 150 consecutive patients. After endoscopy, patients and physicians completed questionnaires evaluating the difficulty of the endoscopy. No statistically significant differences were found between the full formula and placebo-treated patient responses to the amount of cough or gag, or the degree of difficulty of intubation of the endoscope. Analysis of physician responses showed that in the subgroup of patients being endoscoped for the first time, the gastroscope was introduced more easily (p less than 0.05) when the premedication had been full formula rather than placebo.
这项工作的目的是比较赛他卡因局部麻醉喷雾制剂与安慰剂的疗效。将来自编码但包装和气味相同的喷雾的赛他卡因和安慰剂给予150名连续的患者。内镜检查后,患者和医生完成了评估内镜检查难度的问卷。在全配方组和安慰剂治疗组患者对咳嗽或 gag 的程度、内镜插入难度的反应之间未发现统计学上的显著差异。医生的反应分析表明,在首次接受内镜检查的患者亚组中,当使用全配方药物而非安慰剂进行术前用药时,胃镜插入更容易(p<0.05)。