Department of Human Nutrition & Metabolism, WHO Collaborating Center in Capacity Building in Public Health, Braun School of Public Health, Hebrew University-Hadassah Faculty of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel.
Med Hypotheses. 2011 Oct;77(4):610-3. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2011.06.046. Epub 2011 Jul 26.
Attempts have been made to replace the bio-medical approach with that of systems biology, which considers dynamic human behavior (internal factors) for chronic (rather than acute) disease management. They have not yet incorporated the Bio-psycho-social (BPS) model of Engel which adds patients' background and cultural beliefs (external factors) contributing to their susceptibility to, and coping strategies for, non-communicable diseases (NCDs) the increasing domain of global Public Health. The problem is how to include the social determinants of disease in a comprehensive model of care, especially in the management of chronic disease.
The concept of "sociotype" is proposed as a framework for understanding the interactions between the social, cultural and environmental inputs that influence the growth, development and life-long behavior of a person, including relationships, lifestyle and coping strategies. Pre-/peri-natal influences on development and subsequent susceptibility to chronic disease are examples of interactions between the sociotype, genotype and phenotype. Disorders of the sociotype, encompassing social determinants (e.g. poverty, education, networking), of disease are major contributors to the increase in NCDs, as well as for mental illness and absenteeism. Thus, people are the product of a threefold cord--genotype, phenotype and sociotype. WHAT NEXT?: Holistic management of patients through the BPS model have to be aligned with the relevant elements of systems biology--context, space, time and robustness--that pertain to the sociotype. Medical curricula should balance basic sciences with disciplines such as psychology, sociology, anthropology and public health that attempt to explain human behavior and the social determinants of disease. This requires methodologies combining qualitative and quantitative research to study simultaneous interactions (and their possible mechanisms) between systems biology and the BPS model. The neologism "sociotype" highlights the importance of the social dimension of the BPS model in a novel and useful way. The sociotype, with its effects on genotype and phenotype, will bring psychosocial variables into a paradigm of medical practice to promote health and improve the management of chronic illness.
人们尝试用系统生物学来替代生物医学方法,系统生物学考虑了人类的动态行为(内部因素),以便对慢性(而非急性)疾病进行管理。但这些方法尚未纳入 Engel 的生物-心理-社会(BPS)模型,该模型增加了患者背景和文化信仰(外部因素),这些因素会影响他们对非传染性疾病(NCDs)的易感性和应对策略,而 NCDs 正是全球公共卫生日益关注的领域。问题在于如何将疾病的社会决定因素纳入全面的护理模式,尤其是在慢性病管理中。
提出“社会型”概念,作为理解影响个人成长、发展和终身行为的社会、文化和环境输入之间相互作用的框架,包括人际关系、生活方式和应对策略。产前/围产期对发育的影响以及随后对慢性疾病的易感性就是社会型、基因型和表型之间相互作用的例子。社会型(例如贫困、教育、社交网络)中的疾病决定因素障碍是 NCD 以及精神疾病和旷工增加的主要原因。因此,人是基因型、表型和社会型三者的结合体。
下一步是什么?:通过 BPS 模型对患者进行整体管理,必须与系统生物学的相关要素保持一致,包括与社会型相关的上下文、空间、时间和稳健性。医学课程应平衡基础科学与心理学、社会学、人类学和公共卫生等学科,这些学科试图解释人类行为和疾病的社会决定因素。这需要结合定性和定量研究的方法,研究系统生物学和 BPS 模型之间的同时相互作用(及其可能的机制)。新词“社会型”以新颖而有用的方式突出了 BPS 模型的社会维度的重要性。社会型通过对基因型和表型的影响,将社会心理变量纳入医学实践的范例,以促进健康并改善慢性病的管理。