• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

缺勤筛查问卷 (ASQ):一种预测腰痛工人长期缺勤的新工具。

Absenteeism screening questionnaire (ASQ): a new tool for predicting long-term absenteeism among workers with low back pain.

机构信息

Département des Relations Industrielles, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

J Occup Rehabil. 2012 Mar;22(1):27-50. doi: 10.1007/s10926-011-9318-0.

DOI:10.1007/s10926-011-9318-0
PMID:21796374
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Over the last decades, psychosocial factors were identified by many studies as significant predictive variables in the development of disability related to common low back disorders, which thus contributed to the development of biopsychosocial prevention interventions. Biopsychosocial interventions were supposed to be more effective than usual interventions in improving different outcomes. Unfortunately, most of these interventions show inconclusive results. The use of screening questionnaires was proposed as a solution to improve their efficacy. The aim of this study was to validate a new screening questionnaire to identify workers at risk of being absent from work for more than 182 cumulative days and who are more susceptible to benefit from prevention interventions.

METHODS

Injured workers receiving income replacement benefits from the Quebec Compensation Board (n = 535) completed a 67-item questionnaire in the sub-acute stage of pain and provided information about work-related events 6 and 12 months later. Reliability and validity of the 67-item questionnaire were determined respectively by test-retest reliability and internal consistency analysis, as well as by construct validity analyses. The Cox regression model and the maximum likelihood method were used to fix a model allowing calculation of a probability of absence of more than 182 days. Criterion validity and discriminative capacity of this model were calculated.

RESULTS

Sub-sections from the 67-item questionnaire were moderately to highly correlated 2 weeks later (r = 0.52-0.80) and showed moderate to good internal consistency (0.70-0.94). Among the 67-item questionnaire, six sub-sections and variables (22 items) were predictive of long-term absence from work: fear-avoidance beliefs related to work, return to work expectations, annual family income before-taxes, last level of education attained, work schedule and work concerns. The area under the ROC curve was 73%.

CONCLUSIONS

The significant predictive variables of long-term absence from work were dominated by workplace conditions and individual perceptions about work. In association with individual psychosocial variables, these variables could contribute to identify potentially useful prevention interventions and to reduce the significant costs associated with LBP long-term absenteeism.

摘要

简介

过去几十年,许多研究发现心理社会因素是导致常见下腰痛相关残疾发展的重要预测变量,这促成了生物心理社会预防干预的发展。生物心理社会干预应该比常规干预更能有效改善各种结果。不幸的是,这些干预中的大多数显示出不确定的结果。提出使用筛查问卷是提高其疗效的一种解决方案。本研究的目的是验证一种新的筛查问卷,以识别因疼痛而处于亚急性阶段并可能从预防干预中受益的工人,这些工人缺勤超过 182 天的累积天数的风险更高。

方法

从魁北克赔偿委员会(n=535)领取收入替代福利的受伤工人在疼痛亚急性阶段完成了一份包含 67 个项目的问卷,并在 6 个月和 12 个月后提供了与工作相关事件的信息。通过测试 - 再测试可靠性和内部一致性分析,以及结构有效性分析,确定了 67 项问卷的可靠性和有效性。使用 Cox 回归模型和最大似然法建立一个可以计算缺勤超过 182 天的概率的模型。计算了该模型的标准有效性和判别能力。

结果

问卷的子部分在两周后相关性中等至高度(r=0.52-0.80),并且具有中等至良好的内部一致性(0.70-0.94)。在 67 项问卷中,有六个子部分和变量(22 个项目)可预测长期缺勤:与工作相关的恐惧回避信念、重返工作的期望、税前家庭年收入、最后受教育程度、工作时间表和工作顾虑。ROC 曲线下面积为 73%。

结论

长期缺勤的显著预测变量主要由工作场所条件和个人对工作的看法决定。与个人心理社会变量结合使用,这些变量可以有助于确定潜在有用的预防干预措施,并减少与 LBP 长期缺勤相关的重大成本。

相似文献

1
Absenteeism screening questionnaire (ASQ): a new tool for predicting long-term absenteeism among workers with low back pain.缺勤筛查问卷 (ASQ):一种预测腰痛工人长期缺勤的新工具。
J Occup Rehabil. 2012 Mar;22(1):27-50. doi: 10.1007/s10926-011-9318-0.
2
Measuring psychosocial variables in patients with (sub) acute low back pain complaints, at risk for chronicity: a validation study of the Acute Low Back Pain Screening Questionnaire-Dutch Language Version.测量(亚)急性下背痛患者的心理社会变量,有慢性化风险:急性下背痛筛查问卷-荷兰语版的验证研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Feb 15;35(4):447-52. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bd9e3b.
3
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and psychometric properties of the Hausa version of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire in patients with low back pain.《恐惧回避信念问卷》豪萨语版本在腰痛患者中的翻译、跨文化调适及心理测量学特性
Scand J Pain. 2019 Jan 28;19(1):83-92. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0303.
4
Construct and predictive validity of the German Örebro questionnaire short form for psychosocial risk factor screening of patients with low back pain.用于腰痛患者心理社会风险因素筛查的德国厄勒布鲁问卷简表的结构效度和预测效度。
Eur Spine J. 2016 Jan;25(1):325-332. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4196-3. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
5
Validation of an adaptation of the stress process model for predicting low back pain related long-term disability outcomes: a cohort study.验证压力过程模型的适应性以预测与腰痛相关的长期残疾结局:一项队列研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Jun 1;35(13):1307-15. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c03d06.
6
Screening for elevated levels of fear-avoidance beliefs regarding work or physical activities in people receiving outpatient therapy.对接受门诊治疗的人群进行筛查,以了解其对工作或体育活动的恐惧回避信念水平是否升高。
Phys Ther. 2009 Aug;89(8):770-85. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080227. Epub 2009 Jun 18.
7
Psychosocial variables in patients with (sub)acute low back pain: an inception cohort in primary care physical therapy in The Netherlands.(亚)急性下背痛患者的心理社会变量:荷兰初级保健物理治疗中的一个起始队列研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Mar 1;32(5):586-92. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000256447.72623.56.
8
Predictors of disability and absenteeism in workers with non-specific low back pain: A longitudinal 15-month study.非特异性下腰痛患者残疾和缺勤的预测因素:一项为期 15 个月的纵向研究。
Appl Ergon. 2018 Apr;68:176-185. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.11.011. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
9
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Back Beliefs Questionnaire in Modern Standard Arabic.《背部信念问卷》现代标准阿拉伯语版的翻译、跨文化调适及心理测量学特性
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Feb;39(3):272-280. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2016.1140832. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
10
Identifying patient fear-avoidance beliefs by physical therapists managing patients with low back pain.物理治疗师管理腰痛患者时识别患者的恐惧回避信念。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 Dec;40(12):774-83. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3381. Epub 2010 Oct 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic Factors and Models for Predicting Work Absence in Adults with Musculoskeletal Conditions Consulting a Healthcare Practitioner: A Systematic Review.咨询医疗从业者的肌肉骨骼疾病成人患者工作缺勤预测的预后因素和模型:一项系统评价
J Occup Rehabil. 2025 Jun;35(2):181-214. doi: 10.1007/s10926-024-10205-y. Epub 2024 May 16.
2
A Systematic Search and Review of Questionnaires Measuring Individual psychosocial Factors Predicting Return to Work After Musculoskeletal and Common Mental Disorders.系统搜索和综述测量个体心理社会因素预测肌肉骨骼和常见精神障碍后重返工作的问卷。
J Occup Rehabil. 2021 Sep;31(3):491-511. doi: 10.1007/s10926-020-09935-6. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of an adaptation of the stress process model for predicting low back pain related long-term disability outcomes: a cohort study.验证压力过程模型的适应性以预测与腰痛相关的长期残疾结局:一项队列研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Jun 1;35(13):1307-15. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c03d06.
2
The Back Disability Risk Questionnaire for work-related, acute back pain: prediction of unresolved problems at 3-month follow-up.与工作相关的急性背痛的背部残疾风险问卷:3个月随访时未解决问题的预测
J Occup Environ Med. 2009 Feb;51(2):185-94. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e318192bcf8.
3
Early patient screening and intervention to address individual-level occupational factors ("blue flags") in back disability.
Framework for improving outcome prediction for acute to chronic low back pain transitions.
改善急性至慢性下腰痛转变结局预测的框架。
Pain Rep. 2020 Mar 4;5(2):e809. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000809. eCollection 2020 Mar-Apr.
4
Multidimensional screening for predicting pain problems in adults: a systematic review of screening tools and validation studies.用于预测成人疼痛问题的多维筛查:筛查工具及验证研究的系统评价
Pain Rep. 2019 Sep 11;4(5):e775. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000775. eCollection 2019 Sep-Oct.
5
Individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non-specific low back pain: prognostic factor review.非特异性下腰痛的个体康复期望与预后:预后因素综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 25;2019(11):CD011284. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011284.pub2.
6
Person-related factors associated with work participation in employees with health problems: a systematic review.与健康问题员工工作参与相关的人员相关因素:系统评价。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2018 Jul;91(5):497-512. doi: 10.1007/s00420-018-1308-5. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
7
Can screening instruments accurately determine poor outcome risk in adults with recent onset low back pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis.筛查工具能否准确判定近期出现腰痛的成年人预后不良风险?一项系统评价与Meta分析。
BMC Med. 2017 Jan 19;15(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0774-4.
8
The Relationship Between Work-Disability Duration and Claimant's Expected Time to Return to Work as Recorded by Workers' Compensation Claims Managers.工作伤残持续时间与工人赔偿索赔经理记录的索赔人预计返回工作岗位时间之间的关系。
J Occup Rehabil. 2017 Jun;27(2):284-295. doi: 10.1007/s10926-016-9656-z.
9
Cost-effectiveness of 40-hour versus 100-hour vocational rehabilitation on work participation for workers on sick leave due to subacute or chronic musculoskeletal pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.针对因亚急性或慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛而休病假的工人,40小时与100小时职业康复对工作参与度的成本效益:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Jul 28;16:317. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0861-4.
10
Development and Validation of a Clinical Prediction Rule of the Return-to-Work Status of Injured Employees in Minnesota.明尼苏达州受伤员工重返工作岗位状态临床预测规则的制定与验证
J Occup Rehabil. 2015 Sep;25(3):599-616. doi: 10.1007/s10926-015-9568-3.
早期患者筛查及干预,以解决背部残疾中个体层面的职业因素(“蓝旗”)。
J Occup Rehabil. 2009 Mar;19(1):64-80. doi: 10.1007/s10926-008-9159-7. Epub 2008 Dec 12.
4
Patients at risk for long-term sick leave because of low back pain.因腰痛而有长期病假风险的患者。
Spine J. 2009 May;9(5):350-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.07.003. Epub 2008 Sep 14.
5
Development of a brief questionnaire to predict long-term disability.开发一份简短问卷以预测长期残疾情况。
J Occup Environ Med. 2008 Sep;50(9):1042-52. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31817d361e.
6
[Pain coping strategies: French adaptation of the coping strategies questionnaire (CSQ-F)].[疼痛应对策略:应对策略问卷的法语改编版(CSQ-F)]
Encephale. 2008 Jan;34(1):47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2006.11.002. Epub 2007 Sep 4.
7
A primary care back pain screening tool: identifying patient subgroups for initial treatment.一种初级保健背痛筛查工具:识别适合初始治疗的患者亚组。
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 May 15;59(5):632-41. doi: 10.1002/art.23563.
8
Chronic non-specific low back pain - sub-groups or a single mechanism?慢性非特异性下腰痛——亚组还是单一机制?
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008 Jan 25;9:11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-11.
9
A screening questionnaire to predict no return to work within 3 months for low back pain claimants.一份用于预测腰痛索赔者3个月内无法重返工作岗位的筛查问卷。
Eur Spine J. 2008 Mar;17(3):380-385. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0567-8. Epub 2008 Jan 3.
10
Psychosocial interventions for low back pain in primary care: lessons learned from recent trials.初级保健中腰痛的心理社会干预:近期试验的经验教训。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jan 1;33(1):81-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e39f9.