Department of Physiotherapy, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Chron Respir Dis. 2011;8(3):181-4. doi: 10.1177/1479972311407355.
Guidelines for conducting the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) indicate that oxyhaemoglobin saturation (SpO( 2)) should not be monitored constantly during the test. The aim of this study was to determine whether the nadir SpO(2) differs from the end-6MWT SpO(2) in patients with chronic respiratory disease. A total of 86 subjects underwent the 6MWT according to a standardized protocol with continuous monitoring of SpO(2) by pulse oximeter. Comparison of nadir SpO(2) and end SpO(2) was made and the proportion of subjects with important desaturation according to each measure was determined. The effect of resting during the 6MWT on the likelihood of a significant difference between nadir and end SpO(2) was evaluated. A total of 29 subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; mean [SD] forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV(1)] 51[21] % predicted) and 57 with interstitial lung disease (ILD; TLCO 49[18] % predicted) were studied. Nadir SpO(2) was slightly lower than end-test SpO(2) (median 87% vs. 88%, p < 0.001) with differences ranging from 1% to 10%. Those who rested during the test (n = 14) were more likely to have a significant difference between nadir SpO(2) and end SpO(2) (p = 0.04). End SpO(2) did not accurately identify desaturation in 21% of subjects. No differences between COPD and ILD were observed. For most patients with chronic respiratory disease, the end SpO(2) and the nadir SpO( 2) are similar during the 6MWT. However, the end SpO(2) does not give an accurate estimate of nadir SpO(2) in patients who rest. Consideration should be given to the constant monitoring of SpO(2) during the 6MWT.
6 分钟步行试验(6MWT)指南指出,在试验过程中不应持续监测血氧饱和度(SpO2)。本研究旨在确定慢性呼吸系统疾病患者在 6MWT 期间,最低 SpO2 是否与 6MWT 末 SpO2 不同。共有 86 名患者按照标准化方案进行 6MWT,通过脉搏血氧仪连续监测 SpO2。比较最低 SpO2 和终末 SpO2,并确定根据每种方法有重要的 SpO2 下降的患者比例。评估 6MWT 期间休息对最低 SpO2 和终末 SpO2 之间显著差异的可能性的影响。研究了 29 名慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD;平均[标准差]1 秒用力呼气量[FEV1] 51[21]%预计值)和 57 名间质性肺疾病(ILD;TLCO 49[18]%预计值)患者。最低 SpO2 略低于试验末 SpO2(中位数 87%比 88%,p < 0.001),差异范围为 1%至 10%。在试验期间休息的患者(n = 14)更有可能出现最低 SpO2 和终末 SpO2 之间的显著差异(p = 0.04)。终末 SpO2 未能准确识别 21%的患者发生了低氧血症。COPD 和 ILD 之间没有差异。对于大多数患有慢性呼吸系统疾病的患者,在 6MWT 期间,终末 SpO2 和最低 SpO2 相似。然而,在休息的患者中,终末 SpO2 并不能准确估计最低 SpO2。应考虑在 6MWT 期间持续监测 SpO2。