• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于证据的风险评估和体力活动许可建议:引言。

Evidence-based risk assessment and recommendations for physical activity clearance: an introduction.

机构信息

Unit II Osborne Centre, Cardiovascular Physiology and Rehabilitation Laboratory, 6108 Thunderbird Blvd, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2011 Jul;36 Suppl 1:S1-2. doi: 10.1139/h11-060.

DOI:10.1139/h11-060
PMID:21800937
Abstract

The Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q) and the Physical Activity Readiness Medical Evaluation (PARmed-X) are internationally renowned and extensively used preparticipation screening tools. However, recent feedback from end-users has identified limitations to the existing PAR-Q and PARmed-X screening process. As such, a systematic evaluation of the PAR-Q and PARmed-X forms was conducted, adhering to the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) criteria. Recognized experts in physical activity (PA) and prominent health conditions worked with an expert consensus panel to increase the effectiveness of the PAR-Q and PARmed-X PA participation clearance process. The systematic review process established that the health benefits of PA participation far outweigh the risks in the vast majority of asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals. A new risk continuum and decision tree process was created to allow for the effective risk stratification of prominent health conditions, reducing greatly the barriers to PA participation for the majority of individuals. The new PA participation clearance process is available in new paper and online versions (PAR-Q+) and the PARmed-X was replaced with an online interactive computer programme (ePARmed-X+). It is anticipated that this new risk stratification and PA clearance process will reduce markedly the barriers for PA participation for both asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals.

摘要

《体力活动准备问卷 (PAR-Q)》和《体力活动医学评估问卷 (PARmed-X)》是国际知名且广泛使用的赛前筛查工具。然而,最近来自终端用户的反馈指出了现行的 PAR-Q 和 PARmed-X 筛查流程存在局限性。因此,我们按照《评估、制定和评价指南 (AGREE)》标准,对 PAR-Q 和 PARmed-X 表格进行了系统评估。具有丰富体力活动 (PA)经验和主要健康状况的专家与专家共识小组合作,以提高 PAR-Q 和 PARmed-X 参与 PA 活动的资格审查流程的有效性。系统审查过程确定,在绝大多数无症状和有症状个体中,PA 参与带来的健康益处远远超过风险。我们创建了一个新的风险连续体和决策树流程,以有效地对主要健康状况进行风险分层,从而大大降低了大多数个体参与 PA 的障碍。新的 PA 参与资格审查流程可通过纸质和在线版(PAR-Q+)获取,而 PARmed-X 则被一个在线互动式计算机程序(ePARmed-X+)所取代。预计这种新的风险分层和 PA 资格审查流程将显著降低无症状和有症状个体参与 PA 的障碍。

相似文献

1
Evidence-based risk assessment and recommendations for physical activity clearance: an introduction.基于证据的风险评估和体力活动许可建议:引言。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2011 Jul;36 Suppl 1:S1-2. doi: 10.1139/h11-060.
2
Enhancing the effectiveness of clearance for physical activity participation: background and overall process.增强体育活动参与度清除效果:背景与总体流程。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2011 Jul;36 Suppl 1:S3-13. doi: 10.1139/h11-044.
3
Evidence-based risk assessment and recommendations for physical activity clearance: Consensus Document 2011.基于证据的风险评估和体力活动许可建议:共识文件 2011 年版。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2011 Jul;36 Suppl 1:S266-98. doi: 10.1139/h11-062.
4
Evidence-based risk assessment and recommendations for physical activity clearance: established cardiovascular disease.基于证据的风险评估和体力活动清除建议:已确立的心血管疾病。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2011 Jul;36 Suppl 1:S190-213. doi: 10.1139/h11-050.
5
Evidence-based risk assessment and recommendations for exercise testing and physical activity clearance in apparently healthy individuals.基于证据的风险评估以及对貌似健康个体进行运动试验和体力活动清除的建议。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2011 Jul;36 Suppl 1:S14-32. doi: 10.1139/h11-048.
6
Evidence-based risk assessment and recommendations for physical activity clearance: stroke and spinal cord injury.基于证据的风险评估和体力活动清除建议:中风和脊髓损伤。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2011 Jul;36 Suppl 1:S214-31. doi: 10.1139/h11-055.
7
Evidence-based risk assessment and recommendations for physical activity clearance: diabetes mellitus and related comorbidities.基于证据的运动风险评估与推荐:糖尿病及其相关合并症。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2011 Jul;36 Suppl 1:S154-89. doi: 10.1139/h11-063.
8
Evidence-based risk assessment and recommendations for physical activity: arthritis, osteoporosis, and low back pain.基于证据的体力活动风险评估与建议:关节炎、骨质疏松症和下腰痛。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2011 Jul;36 Suppl 1:S49-79. doi: 10.1139/h11-037.
9
Evidence-based risk assessment and recommendations for physical activity clearance: cognitive and psychological conditions.基于证据的风险评估和体力活动清除建议:认知和心理状况。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2011 Jul;36 Suppl 1:S113-53. doi: 10.1139/h11-041.
10
Evidence-based risk assessment and recommendations for physical activity clearance: pregnancy.基于证据的体力活动解除风险评估和建议:妊娠。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2011 Jul;36 Suppl 1:S33-48. doi: 10.1139/h11-061.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of structured exercise and oat supplementation for treating non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: protocol of a randomized controlled trial.结构化运动与燕麦补充剂治疗非酒精性脂肪性肝病的疗效:一项随机对照试验方案
Nutr J. 2025 Apr 26;24(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12937-025-01128-2.
2
Prescribing Physical Activity and Exercise for People with CKD: A Practical Guide by the Global Renal Exercise Network.全球肾脏运动网络为慢性肾脏病患者开具体育活动和运动处方:实用指南
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2025 Mar 14;20(6):876-888. doi: 10.2215/CJN.0000000708.
3
Sex differences in ventricular-vascular interactions associated with aerobic capacity.
与有氧能力相关的心室-血管相互作用中的性别差异。
Echo Res Pract. 2025 Jan 20;12(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s44156-024-00066-9.
4
Efficacy of aerobic exercise for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders receiving ART: An RCT.接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的艾滋病相关神经认知障碍患者进行有氧运动的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
S Afr J Physiother. 2024 Dec 11;80(1):2104. doi: 10.4102/sajp.v80i1.2104. eCollection 2024.
5
Complete Lifestyle Medicine Intervention Program-Ontario: Implementation Protocol for a Rural Study.完整生活方式医学干预项目——安大略省:一项农村研究的实施方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Dec 31;13:e59179. doi: 10.2196/59179.
6
Utilization and Potential Disparities in Access to Physical Therapy for Spine Pain in the Long-Term Care Population.长期护理人群中脊柱疼痛物理治疗的使用情况及潜在差异
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Nov;105(11):2089-2096. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.05.032. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
7
The Nexus of Training Duration, Body Image, Nutritional Practices, and Mental Health: Insights from a Strength Training Cohort.训练时长、身体意象、营养习惯与心理健康之间的联系:来自力量训练队列研究的见解
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Mar 23;14(4):267. doi: 10.3390/bs14040267.
8
Prospective association of eHealth literacy and health literacy with physical activity among Chinese college students: a multiple mediation analysis.电子健康素养与健康素养对中国大学生身体活动的前瞻性关联:多重中介分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 8;12:1275691. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1275691. eCollection 2024.
9
Exercise therapy as a digital therapeutic for chronic disease management: consideration for clinical product development.运动疗法作为一种用于慢性病管理的数字疗法:临床产品开发的考量
Front Digit Health. 2023 Dec 20;5:1250979. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1250979. eCollection 2023.
10
Energy Costs of Chair Sitting and Standing Video Exercises in Chinese Older Adults Over 60 Years.60岁以上中国老年人进行椅子坐姿和站立视频锻炼的能量消耗
Int J Exerc Sci. 2023 Jun 1;16(7):814-827. doi: 10.70252/YTJZ3278. eCollection 2023.