School of Exercise Science, Physical and Health Education, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2011 Jul;36 Suppl 1:S113-53. doi: 10.1139/h11-041.
Physical activity has established mental and physical health benefits, but related adverse events have not received attention. The purpose of this paper was to review the documented adverse events occurring from physical activity participation among individuals with psychological or cognitive conditions. Literature was identified through electronic database (e.g., MEDLINE, psychINFO) searching. Studies were eligible if they described a published paper examining the effect of changes on physical activity behaviour, included a diagnosed population with a cognitive or psychological disorder, and reported on the presence or absence of adverse events. Quality of included studies was assessed, and the analyses examined the overall evidence by available subcategories. Forty trials passed the eligibility criteria; these were grouped (not mutually exclusively) by dementia (n = 5), depression (n = 10), anxiety disorders (n = 12), eating disorders (n = 4), psychotic disorders (n = 4), and intellectual disability (n = 15). All studies displayed a possible risk of bias, ranging from moderate to high. The results showed a relatively low prevalence of adverse events. Populations with dementia, psychological disorders, or intellectual disability do not report considerable or consequential adverse events from physical activity independent of associated comorbidities. The one exception to these findings may be Down syndrome populations with atlantoaxial instability; in these cases, additional caution may be required during screening for physical activity. This review, however, highlights the relative paucity of the reported presence or absence of adverse events, and finds that many studies are at high risk of bias toward reporting naturally occurring adverse events.
身体活动对身心健康有好处,但相关的不良事件尚未引起重视。本文旨在综述心理或认知障碍患者参与身体活动时发生的已记录不良事件。通过电子数据库(如 MEDLINE、心理信息)检索文献。如果研究描述了一项关于身体活动行为变化影响的已发表论文,纳入了患有认知或心理障碍的诊断人群,并报告了不良事件的存在或不存在,则该研究符合纳入标准。对纳入研究的质量进行了评估,并根据可用亚组分析了整体证据。有 40 项试验符合入选标准;这些试验按痴呆症(n=5)、抑郁症(n=10)、焦虑症(n=12)、饮食障碍(n=4)、精神病性障碍(n=4)和智力障碍(n=15)进行分组(非互斥)。所有研究均显示出可能存在偏倚,偏倚程度从中度到高度不等。结果显示不良事件的发生率相对较低。患有痴呆症、心理障碍或智力障碍的人群在不考虑相关合并症的情况下,不会因身体活动而报告大量或严重的不良事件。这些发现的一个例外可能是患有寰枢椎不稳定的唐氏综合征人群;在这些情况下,在进行身体活动筛查时可能需要额外的谨慎。然而,本次综述强调了报告不良事件存在或不存在的相对缺乏,并发现许多研究存在报告自然发生不良事件的高度偏倚风险。