Cooley M E, Moriarty H, Berger M S, Selm-Orr D, Coyle B, Short T
University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing in Philadelphia, USA.
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1995 Oct;22(9):1345-51.
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the reading level of educational materials for patients with cancer corresponds to the reading abilities of a sample of patients. A secondary aim was to describe what type of educational materials patients with cancer report as most helpful.
Descriptive, cross-sectional.
Outpatient oncology clinics at an urban Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
A convenience sample of 63 outpatients with cancer.
Investigators used the Word Recognition Achievement Test-Revised Level (WRAT-R2) to measure patients' reading levels. They used the Flesch Index to analyze the reading levels of the booklets that the patients used (14 booklets developed by the American Cancer Society and 16 developed by the National Cancer Institute). Data were analyzed through descriptive statistics and a Wilcoxon signed rank test.
Patient and booklet reading levels.
The reading level of 27% of the sample was less than that of all 30 pamphlets (less than a sixth-grade reading level). Seventeen percent of the patients had a reading level between sixth and eighth grades (representing 47% of the pamphlets). Twenty-nine percent of the sample had WRAT scores between 9th and 12th grades (representing 80% of the pamphlets). Only 27% had WRAT scores of the 13th grade and above. Twenty-six percent of the patients preferred written educational materials alone, while 57% of patients desired more than one method of instruction.
Written materials for the education of patients with cancer must be carefully matched to patient reading levels. Written materials may not be the only desirable mode of instruction.
Given the increasing complexity of cancer care, shorter hospital stays, and a shift toward busy ambulatory care centers, nurses need to develop creative, innovative, and comprehensive patient education programs that are understandable to patients and that use multiple types of instruction.
目的/目标:本研究的目的是确定癌症患者教育材料的阅读水平是否与一组患者样本的阅读能力相符。次要目的是描述癌症患者报告最有帮助的教育材料类型。
描述性横断面研究。
城市退伍军人事务医疗中心的门诊肿瘤诊所。
63名癌症门诊患者的便利样本。
研究人员使用修订版单词识别成就测试水平(WRAT-R2)来测量患者的阅读水平。他们使用弗莱什指数来分析患者使用的手册(美国癌症协会编写的14本手册和美国国立癌症研究所编写的16本手册)的阅读水平。通过描述性统计和威尔科克森符号秩检验对数据进行分析。
患者和手册的阅读水平。
27%的样本阅读水平低于所有30份宣传册(低于六年级阅读水平)。17%的患者阅读水平在六年级至八年级之间(占宣传册的47%)。29%的样本WRAT分数在九年级至十二年级之间(占宣传册的80%)。只有27%的患者WRAT分数在十三年级及以上。26%的患者更喜欢单独的书面教育材料,而57%的患者希望有多种教学方法。
用于癌症患者教育的书面材料必须与患者的阅读水平仔细匹配。书面材料可能不是唯一理想的教学方式。
鉴于癌症护理日益复杂、住院时间缩短以及向繁忙的门诊护理中心转变,护士需要制定富有创造性、创新性和全面性的患者教育计划,这些计划要让患者易于理解并使用多种教学方式。