Cognitive Neuroscience Division, Taub Institute for Research in Alzheimer’s disease and the Aging Brain.
Sleep. 2011 Aug 1;34(8):1039-50. doi: 10.5665/SLEEP.1158.
The prefrontal model suggests that total sleep deprivation (TSD) and healthy aging produce parallel cognitive deficits. Here we decompose global performance on two common tasks into component measures of specific cognitive processes to pinpoint the source of impairments in elderly and young TSD participants relative to young controls and to each other.
The delayed letter recognition task (DLR) was performed in 3 studies. The psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) was performed in 1 of the DLR studies and 2 additional studies.
For DLR, young TSD (n=20, age=24.60 ± 0.62 years) and young control (n=17, age=24.00 ± 2.42); elderly (n=26, age=69.92 ± 1.06). For the PVT, young TSD (n=18, age=26.65 ± 4.57) and young control (n=16, age=25.19 ± 2.90); elderly (n=21, age=71.1 ± 4.92).
Both elderly and young TSD subjects displayed impaired reaction time (RT), our measure of global performance, on both tasks relative to young controls. After decomposing global performance on the DLR, however, a double dissociation was observed as working memory scanning speed was impaired only in elderly subjects while other components of performance were impaired only by TSD. Similarly, for the PVT a second double dissociation was observed as vigilance impairments were present only in TSD while short-term response preparation effects were altered only in the elderly.
The similarity between TSD and the elderly in impaired performance was evident only when examining global RT. In contrast, when specific cognitive components were examined double dissociations were observed between TSD and elderly subjects. This demonstrates the heterogeneity in those cognitive processes impaired in TSD versus the elderly.
前额模型表明,完全睡眠剥夺(TSD)和健康衰老会产生平行的认知缺陷。在这里,我们将两项常见任务的整体表现分解为特定认知过程的组成指标,以确定老年和年轻 TSD 参与者相对于年轻对照组和彼此之间的损害来源。
在 3 项研究中进行了延迟字母识别任务(DLR)。在 1 项 DLR 研究和 2 项额外研究中进行了精神运动警觉任务(PVT)。
对于 DLR,年轻 TSD(n=20,年龄=24.60±0.62 岁)和年轻对照组(n=17,年龄=24.00±2.42 岁);老年人(n=26,年龄=69.92±1.06 岁)。对于 PVT,年轻 TSD(n=18,年龄=26.65±4.57 岁)和年轻对照组(n=16,年龄=25.19±2.90 岁);老年人(n=21,年龄=71.1±4.92 岁)。
与年轻对照组相比,老年和年轻 TSD 受试者在两项任务上的反应时间(RT),即我们的整体表现衡量标准,均受到损害。然而,在 DLR 上分解整体表现后,观察到了双重分离,因为只有老年受试者的工作记忆扫描速度受损,而其他表现成分仅受 TSD 影响。同样,对于 PVT,观察到了第二次双重分离,因为警觉性缺陷仅存在于 TSD 中,而短期反应准备效应仅在老年人中改变。
只有在检查全局 RT 时,TSD 和老年人在表现受损方面的相似性才明显。相比之下,当检查特定的认知成分时,TSD 和老年人之间观察到了双重分离。这表明在 TSD 与老年人之间,那些认知过程受损存在异质性。